Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26017070›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2015

Overall survival differences between patients with inflammatory and noninflammatory breast cancer presenting with distant metastasis at diagnosis.

Tamer M Fouad, Takahiro Kogawa, Diane D Liu, Yu Shen, Hiroko Masuda, Randa El-Zein, Wendy A Woodward, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Ricardo H Alvarez, Banu Arun and 6 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Maintenance Pembrolizumab Therapy in Patients with Metastatic HER2-negative Breast Cancer with Prior Response to Chemotherapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tamer M FouadDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Takahiro Kogawa
Diane D Liu
Yu Shen
Hiroko Masuda
Randa El-Zein
Wendy A Woodward
Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
Ricardo H Alvarez
Banu Arun
Anthony Lucci
Savitri Krishnamurthy
Gildy Babiera
Thomas A Buchholz
Vicente Valero
Naoto T Ueno
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCairo University · EG

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR BREAST CANCER SCREENING STUDIESR01CA079466 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHEN, YU · 1999 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA079466NCI NIH HHS R01CA079466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive disease. Previous studies have shown that among patients with stage III breast cancer, IBC is associated with a worse prognosis than noninflammatory breast cancer (non-IBC). Whether this difference holds true among patients with stage IV breast cancer has not been studied. We tested the hypothesis that overall survival (OS) is worse in patients with IBC than in those with non-IBC among patients with distant metastasis at diagnosis (stage IV disease). We reviewed the records of 1504 consecutive patients with stage IV breast cancer (IBC: 206; non-IBC: 1298) treated at our institution from 1987 through 2012. Survival curves for IBC and non-IBC subcohorts were compared. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine predictors of OS. The median follow-up period was 4.7 years. IBC was associated with shorter median OS time than non-IBC (2.27 vs. 3.40 years; P = 0.0128, log-rank test). In a multicovariate Cox model that included 1389 patients, the diagnosis of IBC was a significant independent predictor of worse OS (hazard ratio = 1.431, P = 0.0011). Other significant predictors of worse OS included Black (vs. White) ethnicity, younger age at diagnosis, negative HER2 status, and visceral (vs. nonvisceral) site of metastasis. IBC is associated with shorter OS than non-IBC in patients with distant metastasis at diagnosis. The prognostic impact of IBC should be taken into consideration among patients with stage IV breast cancer.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInflammatory Breast NeoplasmsMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingProportional Hazards ModelsYoung AdultBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID26017070
PMCPMC4492876
OpenAlexW1536926823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.