Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26017038›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2015

Stepwise emergence of azole, echinocandin and amphotericin B multidrug resistance in vivo in Candida albicans orchestrated by multiple genetic alterations.

Rasmus Hare Jensen, Karen Marie Thyssen Astvad, Luis Vale Silva, Dominique Sanglard, Rene Jørgensen, Kristian Fog Nielsen, Estella Glintborg Mathiasen, Ghazalel Doroudian, David Scott Perlin, Maiken Cavling Arendrup

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Micafungin exposure drives multidrug resistance inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Deciphering the multidrug resistance paradigm inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Heterogeneity ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Genetic engineering in diatoms: advances and prospects.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Candida auris MIC testing by EUCAST and clinical and laboratory standards institute broth microdilution, and gradient diffusion strips; to be or not to be amphotericin B resistant?Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Annual review of microbiology · 2023
    Review
  20. Whole-Genome Sequence Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Rasmus Hare JensenMicrobiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karen Marie Thyssen AstvadMicrobiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Luis Vale SilvaInstitute of Microbiology, University of Lausanne and University Hospital Center (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Dominique SanglardInstitute of Microbiology, University of Lausanne and University Hospital Center (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Rene JørgensenMicrobiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristian Fog NielsenDepartment of Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Estella Glintborg MathiasenMicrobiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Ghazalel DoroudianClinical Microbiology Laboratory, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
David Scott PerlinPublic Health and Research Institute, New Jersey Medical School-Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Newark, NJ, USA.
Maiken Cavling ArendrupMicrobiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark maca@ssi.dk.
Statens Serum Institut · DKUniversity of Lausanne · CHHerlev Hospital · DKRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

Critical Factors Influencing Echinocandin Resistance in CandidaglabrataR01AI109025 · NIAID · RBHS-NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PERLIN, DAVID S · 2014 to 2025
$9.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI109025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study was to characterize the underlying molecular mechanisms in consecutive clinical Candida albicans isolates from a single patient displaying stepwise-acquired multidrug resistance.

methodsNine clinical isolates (P-1 to P-9) were susceptibility tested by EUCAST EDef 7.2 and Etest. P-4, P-5, P-7, P-8 and P-9 were available for further studies. Relatedness was evaluated by MLST. Additional genes were analysed by sequencing (including FKS1, ERG11, ERG2 and TAC1) and gene expression by quantitative PCR (CDR1, CDR2 and ERG11). UV-spectrophotometry and GC-MS were used for sterol analyses. In vivo virulence was determined in the insect model Galleria mellonella and evaluated by log-rank Mantel-Cox tests.

resultsP-1 + P-2 were susceptible, P-3 + P-4 fluconazole resistant, P-5 pan-azole resistant, P-6 + P-7 pan-azole and echinocandin resistant and P-8 + P-9 MDR. MLST supported genetic relatedness among clinical isolates. P-4 harboured four changes in Erg11 (E266D, G307S, G450E and V488I), increased expression of ERG11 and CDR2 and a change in Tac1 (R688Q). P-5, P-7, P-8 and P-9 had an additional change in Erg11 (A61E), increased expression of CDR1, CDR2 and ERG11 (except for P-7) and a different amino acid change in Tac1 (R673L). Echinocandin-resistant isolates harboured the Fks1 S645P alteration. Polyene-resistant P-8 + P-9 lacked ergosterol and harboured a frameshift mutation in ERG2 (F105SfsX23). Virulence was attenuated (but equivalent) in the clinical isolates, but higher than in the azole- and echinocandin-resistant unrelated control strain.

conclusionsC. albicans demonstrates a diverse capacity to adapt to antifungal exposure. Potentially novel resistance-inducing mutations in TAC1, ERG11 and ERG2 require independent validation.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, FungalAgedAmphotericin BAnimalsAntifungal AgentsAzolesCandida albicansCandidiasisDNA, FungalEchinocandinsGenotypeHumansLepidopteraMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMultilocus Sequence TypingAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsAzolesDNA, FungalEchinocandinsantifungal resistancemolecular typingmycologyresistance mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID26017038
PMCPMC4553713
OpenAlexW1949381873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.