Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26016830›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Evaluation of traps and lures for mosquito vectors and xenomonitoring of Wuchereria bancrofti infection in a high prevalence Samoan Village.

Limb K Hapairai, Catherine Plichart, Take Naseri, Ualesi Silva, Lameko Tesimale, Paulo Pemita, Hervé C Bossin, Thomas R Burkot, Scott A Ritchie, Patricia M Graves and 2 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The use of molecular xenomonitoring for surveillance of mosquito-borne diseases.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Limb K HapairaiInstitut Louis Malardé, Papeete, French Polynesia. lhapairai@yahoo.com.
Catherine PlichartInstitut Louis Malardé, Papeete, French Polynesia. cplichart@mail.pf.
Take NaseriMinistry of Health, Apia, Samoa. taken@health.gov.ws.
Ualesi SilvaMinistry of Health, Apia, Samoa. UalesiS@health.gov.ws.
Lameko TesimaleMinistry of Health, Apia, Samoa. LamekoT@health.gov.ws.
Paulo PemitaMinistry of Health, Apia, Samoa. PauloP@health.gov.ws.
Hervé C BossinInstitut Louis Malardé, Papeete, French Polynesia. hbossin@ilm.pf.
Thomas R BurkotAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns and Townsville, Australia. tom.burkot@jcu.edu.au.
Scott A RitchieAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns and Townsville, Australia. scott.ritchie@jcu.edu.au.
Patricia M GravesAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns and Townsville, Australia. patricia.graves@jcu.edu.au.
Wayne MelroseAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns and Townsville, Australia. wayne.melrose@jcu.edu.au.
Hayley JosephAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns and Townsville, Australia. joseph.h@wehi.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF) in Samoa continues to be challenging despite multiple annual mass drug campaigns aimed at stopping transmission by reducing the prevalence and density of microfilaraemia. The persistence of transmission may be partly related to the highly efficient Aedes vectors. The assessment of pathogen transmission by mosquito vectors and of vector control relies on the ability to capture mosquitoes efficiently. The aims of this study are to compare trapping methods to capture LF-infected mosquitoes and determine the role in transmission of the species of Aedes mosquitoes in the area.

methodsFasitoo-Tai village was the chosen site because of persistent transmission despite annual mass drug administration. Sampling methods included BioGents Sentinel (BGS) trap, human-baited collections (HBC) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) trap. BGS and CDC traps were baited with BG-lure, CO2, and/or octenol. Individual trap locations were geo-located and efficiency of sampling methods was evaluated using a randomized Latin-square design in two locations. Number of mosquitoes collected (male and female), as well as species for each trapping method were determined. Additionally, Ae. polynesiensis and Ae. (Finlaya) spp. females were pooled by trap method and analysed for filarial DNA. Infection prevalence was estimated using the PoolScreen software.

resultsThe BGS trap with any type of bait collected more mosquitoes compared to both the CDC trap and the HBC. The BGS trap baited with BG-lure collected more mosquitoes than with CO2 and octenol. There were no significant differences between trapping methods in terms of proportions of infected females collected. The prevalence of filarial infection in Ae. polynesiensis and Ae. (Finlaya) spp. was estimated at 4.7% and 0.67% respectively.

conclusionsThis study supports the use of the BGS trap for research on and surveillance of the mosquito vectors of LF in Samoa. The BGS trap is a suitable and safer alternative to HBC for sampling Ae. polynesiensis and Ae. (Finlaya) spp., which continue to be the predominant vectors of LF. Of concern was the high prevalence of LF in mosquitoes despite a recent mass drug administration programme. This highlights the urgency for updated policies concerning filariasis elimination in Samoa.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsElephantiasis, FilarialFemaleHumansInsect VectorsMaleMosquito ControlPrevalenceRural HealthSamoaWuchereria bancrofti

Identifiers

PMID26016830
PMCPMC4449966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.