Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26016797›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2015

Utilization of research findings for health policy making and practice: evidence from three case studies in Bangladesh.

David Roger Walugembe, Suzanne N Kiwanuka, Joseph K B Matovu, Elizeus Rutebemberwa, Laura Reichenbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David Roger WalugembeMakerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. dwalugembe@musph.ac.ug.
Suzanne N KiwanukaMakerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. skiwanuka@musph.ac.ug.
Joseph K B MatovuMakerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. jmatovu@musph.ac.ug.
Elizeus RutebemberwaMakerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. ellie@musph.ac.ug.
Laura ReichenbachInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (icddr,b), P.O.Box 128, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh. lreichenbach@popcouncil.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn striving to contribute towards improved health outcomes, health research institutions generate and accumulate huge volumes of relevant but often underutilized data. This study explores activities undertaken by researchers from the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), an international research institution that promotes the utilization of their findings in the policymaking processes in Bangladesh.

methodsThe study used an exploratory case study design and employed qualitative methods to explore activities implemented to promote research utilization and the extent to which researchers felt that their findings contributed to the policymaking process. Data were collected between September and December 2011 through key informant interviews, focus group discussions with study investigators, and database and document reviews. We reviewed findings from 19 reproductive health studies conducted and completed by icddr,b researchers between 2001 and 2011. We interviewed 21 key informants, including 13 researchers, two policy makers, and six programme implementers. Data were entered into Microsoft Word and analyzed manually following a thematic framework approach. Following the World Health Organization/Turning Research into Practice (WHO/TRIP) framework, three case studies of how research findings were utilized in the policymaking processes in Bangladesh were documented.

resultsActivities implemented to promote research utilization included conducting dissemination workshops, publishing scientific papers, developing policy briefs, providing technical assistance to policymakers and programme implementers, holding one-on-one meetings, and joining advocacy networks. The majority of the researchers (12 of 13) reported that their study findings were utilized to influence policymaking processes at different levels. However, some researchers reported being unaware of whether and how their findings were utilized. As regards actual utilization of research findings, the evidence from the three case studies indicate that research findings can be utilized instrumentally, conceptually and symbolically, and at different stages within the policymaking process, including agenda setting and policy formulation and implementation.

conclusionsThe results show that research findings from icddr,b were promoted and utilized in health policymaking processes in Bangladesh using a variety of utilization approaches. These results suggest a need for using multiple approaches to promote utilization of research findings in health policymaking processes.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesDelivery of Health CareHealth PolicyPolicy MakingResearchBangladeshEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleOrganizational Case Studies

Identifiers

PMID26016797
PMCPMC4449578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.