Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26016714›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2015

[Biliary fistulas and biliary congestion after hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery].

M-H Dahlke, M Loss, H J Schlitt

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M-H DahlkeKlinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Deutschland, marc.dahlke@ukr.de.
M Loss
H J Schlitt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biliary complications after hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery can have severe consequences for the long-term quality of life of patients. Adequate and timely diagnosis of the underlying problem by an experienced surgeon is essential. Ultrasonography, computed tomography, contrast-enhanced fluoroscopy of drains and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are helpful examinations that can be employed in a step-wise approach. Early re-do surgery is indicated in the initial postoperative course. Interventional methods, such as ERCP and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage ( PTCD, plus stents and drains) offer a variety of additional therapeutic options that should be used by the experienced interventionalist in a patient-tailored interdisciplinary fashion.

Indexed as

Biliary FistulaCholestasisDigestive System Surgical ProceduresEarly DiagnosisHumansPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.