ArticleJournal of human hypertension2016
Individual 6-year systolic blood pressure change and impact on cardiovascular mortality in a French general population.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure and cardiovascular events among the working-age population in Japan: findings from the Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2021Article
- Short-Term and Long-Term Blood Pressure Changes and the Risk of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality.BioMed research international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Impact of blood pressure (BP) visit-to-visit variability remains controversial for untreated hypertensives and for normotensive subjects. Association between 6-year systolic BP change and all-cause and cardiovascular (CVD) mortality was studied in general primary care population including untreated hypertensive and normotensive subjects. Normotensive individuals and untreated high BP patients (40,926 and 14,283, respectively) had two check-ups (interval: 5.8±2.2 years) at the IPC center (Paris). Follow-up was 6.1±3.2 years: 1131 people died, 114 from CVD causes. Systolic BP (SBP) change was assessed by tertiles of absolute differences between V1 and V2, and the relationship with mortality was analysed with multivariate Cox models (hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (CI)) including V1 or V2 parameters notably SBP. Adjusting for V1 variables, mortality was associated with SBP change, for the entire population (all-cause: HR=1.15 (95%: 1.01-1.30) and CVD: HR=1.95 (95%: 1.25-3.05)) and in hypertensive individuals: (HR=1.31 (95%: 1.08-1.59) and HR=2.51 (95%: 1.34-4.72), respectively). Adjustments for V2 variables gave similar results. For those who were normotensive at V1, the associations were not significant. In this primary care population, individual long-term visit-to-visit change of BP is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in hypertensive individuals but not in those with normal BP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.