Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26016444›Full record

ArticleArchives of virology2015

Protection against live rotavirus challenge in mice induced by parenteral and mucosal delivery of VP6 subunit rotavirus vaccine.

Suvi Lappalainen, Ana Ruth Pastor, Maria Malm, Vanessa López-Guerrero, Fernando Esquivel-Guadarrama, Laura A Palomares, Timo Vesikari, Vesna Blazevic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Rotavirus vaccines: progress and new developments.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Current and new rotavirus vaccines.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Suvi LappalainenVaccine Research Center, University of Tampere Medical School, Biokatu 10, 33520, Tampere, Finland.
Ana Ruth Pastor
Maria Malm
Vanessa López-Guerrero
Fernando Esquivel-Guadarrama
Laura A Palomares
Timo Vesikari
Vesna Blazevic

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Live oral rotavirus (RV) vaccines are part of routine childhood immunization but are associated with adverse effects, particularly intussusception. We have developed a non-live combined RV - norovirus (NoV) vaccine candidate consisting of human RV inner-capsid rVP6 protein and NoV virus-like particles. To determine the effect of delivery route on induction of VP6-specific protective immunity, BALB/c mice were administered a vaccine containing RV rVP6 intramuscularly, intranasally or a combination of both, and challenged with murine RV. At least 65 % protection against RV shedding was observed regardless of delivery route. The levels of post-challenge serum VP6-specific IgA titers correlated with protection.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAnimalsAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralCapsid ProteinsFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GMiceMice, Inbred BALB CRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus VaccinesAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralCapsid ProteinsImmunoglobulin GRotavirus VaccinesVP6 protein, Rotavirus

Identifiers

PMID26016444
PMCPMC4532722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.