Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26015966›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2014

Prevention of adverse events of interferon γ gene therapy by gene delivery of interferon γ-heparin-binding domain fusion protein in mice.

Mitsuru Ando, Yuki Takahashi, Takuma Yamashita, Mai Fujimoto, Makiya Nishikawa, Yoshihiko Watanabe, Yoshinobu Takakura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Production and clinical development of nanoparticles for gene delivery.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mitsuru AndoDepartment of Biopharmaceutics and Drug Metabolism , Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University , Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuki TakahashiDepartment of Biopharmaceutics and Drug Metabolism , Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University , Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Takuma YamashitaDepartment of Biopharmaceutics and Drug Metabolism , Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University , Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Mai FujimotoDepartment of Biopharmaceutics and Drug Metabolism , Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University , Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Makiya NishikawaDepartment of Biopharmaceutics and Drug Metabolism , Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University , Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshihiko WatanabeDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University , Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshinobu TakakuraDepartment of Biopharmaceutics and Drug Metabolism , Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University , Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPKyoto Pharmaceutical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustained gene delivery of interferon (IFN) γ can be an effective treatment, but our previous study showed high levels of IFNγ-induced adverse events, including the loss of body weight. These unwanted events could be reduced by target-specific delivery of IFNγ after in vivo gene transfer. To achieve this, we selected the heparin-binding domain (HBD) of extracellular superoxide dismutase as a molecule to anchor IFNγ to the cell surface. We designed three IFNγ derivatives, IFNγ-HBD1, IFNγ-HBD2, and IFNγ-HBD3, each of which had 1, 2, or 3 HBDs, respectively. Each plasmid-encoding fusion proteins was delivered to the liver, a model target in this study, by hydrodynamic tail vein injection. The serum concentration of IFNγ-HBD2 and IFNγ-HBD3 after gene delivery was lower than that of IFNγ or IFNγ-HBD1. Gene delivery of IFNγ-HBD2, but not of IFNγ-HBD3, effectively increased the mRNA expression of IFNγ-inducible genes in the liver, suggesting liver-specific distribution of IFNγ-HBD2. Gene delivery of IFNγ-HBD2-suppressed tumor growth in the liver as efficiently as that of IFNγ with much less symptoms of adverse effects. These results indicate that the adverse events of IFNγ gene transfer can be prevented by gene delivery of IFNγ-HBD2, a fusion protein with high cell surface affinity.

Identifiers

PMID26015966
PMCPMC4362348
OpenAlexW2328731234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.