Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26015831›Full record

ArticleBiomicrofluidics2015

Droplet confinement and leakage: Causes, underlying effects, and amelioration strategies.

Aaron P Debon, Robert C R Wootton, Katherine S Elvira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Approach to classify, separate, and enrich objects in groups using ensemble sorting.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aaron P DebonInstitute for Chemical and Bioengineering , Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Robert C R WoottonInstitute for Chemical and Bioengineering , Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Katherine S ElviraInstitute for Chemical and Bioengineering , Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4182-1836

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The applicability of droplet-based microfluidic systems to many research fields stems from the fact that droplets are generally considered individual and self-contained reaction vessels. This study demonstrates that, more often than not, the integrity of droplets is not complete, and depends on a range of factors including surfactant type and concentration, the micro-channel surface, droplet storage conditions, and the flow rates used to form and process droplets. Herein, a model microfluidic device is used for droplet generation and storage to allow the comparative study of forty-four different oil/surfactant conditions. Assessment of droplet stability under these conditions suggests a diversity of different droplet failure modes. These failure modes have been classified into families depending on the underlying effect, with both numerical and qualitative models being used to describe the causative effect and to provide practical solutions for droplet failure amelioration in microfluidic systems.

Identifiers

PMID26015831
PMCPMC4409622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.