Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26015637›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics

A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: A study on synthetic bones.

Korhan Ozkan, İsmail Türkmen, Adem Sahin, Yavuz Yildiz, Selim Erturk, Mehmet Salih Soylemez

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05286905 (Biomechanical Testing, Finite Element Analysis and Pilot, Prospective, Randomized, Experimental Clinical Study of Osteosynthesis of Reverse Oblique Peritrochanteric Fractures With PFLP vs Cephalomedullary Nail.), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05286905 naunknown statusnot on this map

Biomechanical Testing, Finite Element Analysis and Pilot, Prospective, Randomized, Experimental Clinical Study of Osteosynthesis of Reverse Oblique Peritrochanteric Fractures With PFLP vs Cephalomedullary Nail.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity General Hospital of PatrasRan2022 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsPertrochanteric Fracture of Femur, ClosedArmsOsteosynthesis cephalomedullary nail, Osteosynthesis proximal femur locking plate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Efficacy of poller screw in addition to lag screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail: a biomechanical evaluation.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Long-term outcomes of distal locking in extracapsular fractures treated with trochanteric Gamma3 nails.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques in osteoporotic reverse oblique intertrochanteric femur fracture with fragmented lateral cortex.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2019
    Article
  20. Fatigue failure of the cephalomedullary nail: revision options, outcomes and review of the literature.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Korhan OzkanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.
İsmail TürkmenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Medeniyet University, GoztepeTraining and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Adem SahinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Corlu State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yavuz YildizDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Medeniyet University, GoztepeTraining and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Selim ErturkDepartment of Material and Metalurgia Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet Salih SoylemezDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Medeniyet University, GoztepeTraining and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul Medeniyet University · TRIstanbul Technical University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of fractures in the trochanteric area has risen with the increasing numbers of elderly people with osteoporosis. Although dynamic hip screw fixation is the gold standard for the treatment of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures, treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures still remains controversial. Intramedullary devices such as Gamma nail or proximal femoral nail and proximal anatomic femur plates are in use for the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures. There are still many investigations to find the optimal implant to treat these fractures with minimum complications. For this reason, we aimed to perform a biomechanical comparison of the proximal femoral nail and the locking proximal anatomic femoral plate in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty synthetic, third generation human femur models, obtained for this purpose, were divided into two groups of 10 bones each. Femurs were provided as a standard representation of AO/Orthopedic Trauma Associationtype 31-A2 unstable fractures. Two types of implantations were inserted: the proximal femoral intramedullary nail in the first group and the locking anatomic femoral plate in the second group. Axial load was applied to the fracture models through the femoral head using a material testing machine, and the biomechanical properties of the implant types were compared.

resultNail and plate models were locked distally at the same level. Axial steady load with a 5 mm/m velocity was applied through the mechanical axis of femur bone models. Axial loading in the proximal femoral intramedullary nail group was 1.78-fold greater compared to the plate group. All bones that had the plate applied were fractured in the portion containing the distal locking screw.

conclusionThe proximal femoral intramedullary nail provides more stability and allows for earlier weight bearing than the locking plate when used for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. Clinicians should be cautious for early weight bearing with locking plate for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures.

Indexed as

Biomechanical comparisonfemoral neck fracturesFemurfracture fixationintertrochanteric femur fracturesintramedullaryintramedullary nailproximal anatomic femoral plate

Identifiers

PMID26015637
PMCPMC4443419
OpenAlexW1553935448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.