Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26015501›Full record

ArticlemBio2015

Temporal hierarchy of gene expression mediated by transcription factor binding affinity and activation dynamics.

Rong Gao, Ann M Stock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Novel Fosfomycin Resistance Mechanism inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Coordination of Phosphate and Magnesium Metabolism in Bacteria.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Control of theEcoSal Plus · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rong GaoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers University-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Ann M StockDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers University-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA stock@cabm.rutgers.edu.
Johnson University · US

Funding

STRUCTURE/FUNCTION OF RESPONSE REGULATOR PROTEINSR01GM047958 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI STOCK, ANN M. · 1992 to 2017
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047958NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM047958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledUnderstanding cellular responses to environmental stimuli requires not only the knowledge of specific regulatory components but also the quantitative characterization of the magnitude and timing of regulatory events. The two-component system is one of the major prokaryotic signaling schemes and is the focus of extensive interest in quantitative modeling and investigation of signaling dynamics. Here we report how the binding affinity of the PhoB two-component response regulator (RR) to target promoters impacts the level and timing of expression of PhoB-regulated genes. Information content has often been used to assess the degree of conservation for transcription factor (TF)-binding sites. We show that increasing the information content of PhoB-binding sites in designed phoA promoters increased the binding affinity and that the binding affinity and concentration of phosphorylated PhoB (PhoB~P) together dictate the level and timing of expression of phoA promoter variants. For various PhoB-regulated promoters with distinct promoter architectures, expression levels appear not to be correlated with TF-binding affinities, in contrast to the intuitive and oversimplified assumption that promoters with higher affinity for a TF tend to have higher expression levels. However, the expression timing of the core set of PhoB-regulated genes correlates well with the binding affinity of PhoB~P to individual promoters and the temporal hierarchy of gene expression appears to be related to the function of gene products during the phosphate starvation response. Modulation of the information content and binding affinity of TF-binding sites may be a common strategy for temporal programming of the expression profile of RR-regulated genes. IMPORTANCE: A single TF often orchestrates the expression of multiple genes in response to environmental stimuli. It is not clear how different TF-binding sites within the regulon dictate the expression profile. Our studies of Escherichia coli PhoB, a response regulator that controls expression of a core set of phosphate assimilation genes in response to phosphate starvation, showed that expression levels of PhoB-regulated genes are under sophisticated control and do not follow a simple correlation with the binding affinity of PhoB~P to individual promoters. However, the expression timing correlates with the PhoB-binding affinity and gene functions. Genes involved in direct Pi uptake contain high-affinity sites and are transcribed earlier than genes involved in phosphorus scavenging. This illustrates an elaborate mechanism of temporally programmed gene expression, even for nondevelopmental pathways.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialDNA, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsPhosphorylationPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalTime FactorsTranscription FactorsDNA, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsPhoB protein, E coliTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID26015501
PMCPMC4447250
OpenAlexW1905737356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.