Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26015317›Full record

ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2015

Revaluation of the clinical and metabolic behavior of children with isolated growth hormone deficiency during GH treatment according to newly proposed note 39 of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA).

A Ciresi, F Cicciò, M C Amato, C Giordano

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of growth hormone on glucose metabolism and insulin resistance in human.Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A CiresiSection of Cardio-Respiratory and Endocrine-Metabolic Diseases, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialist Medicine (DIBIMIS), University of Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
F CicciòSection of Cardio-Respiratory and Endocrine-Metabolic Diseases, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialist Medicine (DIBIMIS), University of Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
M C AmatoSection of Cardio-Respiratory and Endocrine-Metabolic Diseases, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialist Medicine (DIBIMIS), University of Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
C GiordanoSection of Cardio-Respiratory and Endocrine-Metabolic Diseases, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialist Medicine (DIBIMIS), University of Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127, Palermo, Italy. sa.75@libero.it.
University of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed at evaluating the clinical and metabolic behavior of children with isolated growth hormone (GH)-deficiency (GHD), grouped according to the new AIFA criteria for the appropriateness of use and reimbursement of GH treatment in children.

methodsThe clinical and metabolic data of 310 prepubertal children (220 M, 90 F; mean age 10.8 years) grouped, according to new AIFA note 39, into Group A (No. 181 with a peak of GH <8 µg/l), Group B (No. 103 with a peak of GH ≥8 and <10 µg/l) and Group C (No. 26 with a peak of GH >10 µg/l) were retrospectively analyzed. Group A and B, diagnosed as having GHD, were treated with GH for at least 24 months, while Group C was analyzed only at baseline.

resultsAt baseline, Group A showed higher waist circumference than B (p = 0.031) and C (p = 0.041), while no difference in metabolic parameters was found between the three groups. After 12 and 24 months of treatment, Group B showed lower height velocity (p < 0.001 and p = 0.049, respectively) than Group A. As regards the metabolic parameters, both after 12 and 24 months of treatment, in Group B we found higher fasting glucose (p < 0.001 and p = 0.020), insulin (p = 0.002 and p = 0.011), Homa-β (p = 0.020 and p = 0.015) and Homa-IR (both p = 0.001) than Group A, with concomitant lower QUICKI (both p < 0.001) and HDL cholesterol (p = 0.020 and p = 0.011), without difference in other lipid parameters. The HbA1c levels, although always within the normal range, were found higher in Group B than Group A after 12 months (p = 0.015).

conclusionsAccording to the new AIFA criteria, the reduction of GH cut-off for GHD diagnosis can be supported by auxological and metabolic data. The real benefits from GH therapy in children with higher stimulated GH levels at diagnosis remains to be better understand.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDwarfism, PituitaryFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGovernment AgenciesGrowth HormoneHumansItalyMaleGrowth HormoneChildrenGrowth hormone deficiencyItalian Medicines Agency (AIFA)

Identifiers

PMID26015317
OpenAlexW1816151136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.