ArticleBiopolymers2015
DNA cyclization and looping in the wormlike limit: Normal modes and the validity of the harmonic approximation.
Article in Biopolymers, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laplace approximation of J factors for rigid base and rigid basepair models of DNA cyclization.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Building a better bridge between models and experimental data for DNA.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Determinants of cyclization-decyclization kinetics of short DNA with sticky ends.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Loop-closure kinetics reveal a stable, right-handed DNA intermediate in Cre recombination.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For much of the last three decades, Monte Carlo-simulation methods have been the standard approach for accurately calculating the cyclization probability, J, or J factor, for DNA models having sequence-dependent bends or inhomogeneous bending flexibility. Within the last 10 years approaches based on harmonic analysis of semi-flexible polymer models have been introduced, which offer much greater computational efficiency than Monte Carlo techniques. These methods consider the ensemble of molecular conformations in terms of harmonic fluctuations about a well-defined elastic-energy minimum. However, the harmonic approximation is only applicable for small systems, because the accessible conformation space of larger systems is increasingly dominated by anharmonic contributions. In the case of computed values of the J factor, deviations of the harmonic approximation from the exact value of J as a function of DNA length have not been characterized. Using a recent, numerically exact method that accounts for both anharmonic and harmonic contributions to J for wormlike chains of arbitrary size, we report here the apparent error that results from neglecting anharmonic behavior. For wormlike chains having contour lengths less than four times the persistence length, the error in J arising from the harmonic approximation is generally small, amounting to free energies less than the thermal energy, kB T. For larger systems, however, the deviations between harmonic and exact J values increase approximately linearly with size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.