Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26014748›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Information processing via physical soft body.

Kohei Nakajima, Helmut Hauser, Tao Li, Rolf Pfeifer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Metrics for spin-based computing.Nature reviews. Physics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Optomechanical reservoir computing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. TheBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Embedding Bifurcations into Pneumatic Artificial Muscle.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Photonic Physical Reservoir Computing with Tunable Relaxation Time Constant.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Computational capability of ecological dynamics.Royal Society open science · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kohei NakajimaThe Hakubi Center for Advanced Research &Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, 606-8501 Kyoto, Japan.
Helmut HauserDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UB, United Kingdom.
Tao LiDepartment of Engineering and Information Technology, Bern University of Applied Sciences, 2501 Biel, Switzerland.
Rolf Pfeifer1] Institute for Academic Initiatives, Osaka University, Osaka 560-8531, Japan [2] Department of Automation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soft machines have recently gained prominence due to their inherent softness and the resulting safety and resilience in applications. However, these machines also have disadvantages, as they respond with complex body dynamics when stimulated. These dynamics exhibit a variety of properties, including nonlinearity, memory, and potentially infinitely many degrees of freedom, which are often difficult to control. Here, we demonstrate that these seemingly undesirable properties can in fact be assets that can be exploited for real-time computation. Using body dynamics generated from a soft silicone arm, we show that they can be employed to emulate desired nonlinear dynamical systems. First, by using benchmark tasks, we demonstrate that the nonlinearity and memory within the body dynamics can increase the computational performance. Second, we characterize our system's computational capability by comparing its task performance with a standard machine learning technique and identify its range of validity and limitation. Our results suggest that soft bodies are not only impressive in their deformability and flexibility but can also be potentially used as computational resources on top and for free.

Identifiers

PMID26014748
PMCPMC4444959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.