Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26014616›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Fecal ESBL Escherichia coli carriage as a risk factor for bacteremia in patients with hematological malignancies.

Patricia Cornejo-Juárez, Juan Antonio Suárez-Cuenca, Patricia Volkow-Fernández, Jesús Silva-Sánchez, Humberto Barrios-Camacho, Esmeralda Nájera-León, Consuelo Velázquez-Acosta, Diana Vilar-Compte

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparison of stool samples and rectal swabs with and without pre-enrichment for the detection of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCREB).European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing andApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Antimicrobial Resistance inFrontiers in medicine · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Clinical and Economic Impact of Third-Generation Cephalosporin-Resistant Infection or Colonization Caused byInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patricia Cornejo-JuárezDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Av. San Fernando No. 22, Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14000, Mexico City, DF, Mexico. patcornejo@yahoo.com.
Juan Antonio Suárez-CuencaDivision of Clinical Research, "20 de Noviembre," National Medical Center, ISSSTE, Mexico City, Mexico.
Patricia Volkow-FernándezDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Av. San Fernando No. 22, Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14000, Mexico City, DF, Mexico.
Jesús Silva-SánchezDepartamento de Diagnóstico Epidemiológico, Centro de Investigación sobre Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Humberto Barrios-CamachoDepartamento de Diagnóstico Epidemiológico, Centro de Investigación sobre Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Esmeralda Nájera-LeónINSP, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Consuelo Velázquez-AcostaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Av. San Fernando No. 22, Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14000, Mexico City, DF, Mexico.
Diana Vilar-CompteDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Av. San Fernando No. 22, Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14000, Mexico City, DF, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of fecal extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) colonization for bloodstream infection (BSI), clinical outcome, and costs in patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) and severe neutropenia.

methodsThis is a cohort study, carried out at a cancer-referral hospital. The study population comprises patients with HM, hospitalized prior to administration of the first chemotherapy cycle. A stool culture was taken during the first 48 h; they were grouped as colonized by ESBL-EC or non-ESBL-EC. Patients were followed upon completion of chemotherapy or death. The sum of the days of antibiotics and the length of stay of all hospitalizations in the different cycles of chemotherapy were recorded.

resultsWe included 126 patients with a recent diagnosis of HM, grouped as 63 patients colonized by ESBL-EC and 63 colonized by non-ESBL-EC, aged 42 ± 16 years old, 78 males (62%). BSI by ESBL-EC developed in 14 patients (22.2%) colonized by the same strain and in 5 (7.9%) in the group colonized with non-ESBL-EC. BSI by non-ESBL-EC was observed in 3 patients (4.7%) colonized by ESBL-EC and in 17 (26.9%) patients colonized by non-ESBL-EC. Colonization with ESBL-EC increased the risk of BSI by the same strain (relative risk (RR) = 3.4, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.5-7.8, p = 0.001), shorter time to death (74 ± 62 vs. 95 ± 83 days, p < 0.001), longer hospital stay (64 ± 39 vs. 48 ± 32 days, p = 0.01), and higher infection-related costs ($6528 ± $4348 vs. $4722 ± $3173, p = 0.01). There was no difference in overall mortality between both groups.

conclusionsFecal colonization by ESBL-EC is associated with increased risk of BSI by this strain, longer hospital stay, and higher related costs.

Indexed as

AdultBacteremiaCohort StudiesEscherichia coli InfectionsFecesFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHumansMaleProspective StudiesRisk FactorsBloodstream infectionColonizationEscherichia coliExtended-spectrum β-lactamaseMortality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.