Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26014613›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

Targeted Capture of Phylogenetically Informative Ves SINE Insertions in Genus Myotis.

Roy N Platt, Yuhua Zhang, David J Witherspoon, Jinchuan Xing, Alexander Suh, Megan S Keith, Lynn B Jorde, Richard D Stevens, David A Ray

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dynamics of genome size evolution in birds and mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Roy N PlattDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University.
Yuhua ZhangBionomics Research & Technology Center, Environmental and Occupational Health Science Institute, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
David J WitherspoonDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Utah Health Sciences Center.
Jinchuan XingDepartment of Genetics, Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
Alexander SuhDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Megan S KeithDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University.
Lynn B JordeDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Utah Health Sciences Center.
Richard D StevensDepartment of Natural Resources Management and the Museum of Texas Tech University.
David A RayDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University david.4.ray@gmail.com.

Funding

High-throughput Mobile Element Genotyping Using Next-generation SequencingR00HG005846 · NHGRI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI XING, JINCHUAN · 2012 to 2014
$736k
NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG005846NHGRI NIH HHS R00HG005846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of retrotransposon insertions in nonmodel taxa can be technically challenging and costly. This has inhibited progress in understanding retrotransposon insertion dynamics outside of a few well-studied species. To address this problem, we have extended a retrotransposon-based capture and sequence method (ME-Scan [mobile element scanning]) to identify insertions belonging to the Ves family of short interspersed elements (SINEs) across seven species of the bat genus Myotis. We identified between 120,000 and 143,000 SINE insertions in six taxa lacking a draft genome by comparing to the M. lucifugus reference genome. On average, each Ves insertion was sequenced to 129.6 × coverage. When mapped back to the M. lucifugus reference genome, all insertions were confidently assigned within a 10-bp window. Polymorphic Ves insertions were identified in each taxon based on their mapped locations. Using cross-species comparisons and the identified insertion positions, a presence-absence matrix was created for approximately 796,000 insertions. Dollo parsimony analysis of more than 85,000 phylogenetically informative insertions recovered strongly supported, monophyletic clades that correspond with the biogeography of each taxa. This phylogeny is similar to previously published mitochondrial phylogenies, with the exception of the placement of M. vivesi. These results support the utility of our variation on ME-Scan to identify polymorphic retrotransposon insertions in taxa without a reference genome and for large-scale retrotransposon-based phylogenetics.

Indexed as

Short Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsAnimalsChiropteraEvolution, MolecularGenomePhylogenyPolymorphism, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNADollo parsimonyMyotis lucifugusphylogeneticsrare genomic eventsretrotransposon

Identifiers

PMID26014613
PMCPMC4494050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.