ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2015
[The situation of residents in ophthalmology in Germany: Results of an online survey].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Approaches to promoting young talent in ophthalmology-support for clinical training within the specialist training program].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Leadership in ophthalmology training : Opportunities and risks of medical specialist education.Die Ophthalmologie · 2024Review
- [Leadership in ophthalmology training : Opportunities and risks of medical specialist education].Die Ophthalmologie · 2023Review
- Article
- [Employed and self-employed specialists in outpatient ophthalmological care : Comparison with other specialist fields].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2018Article
- [The Homburger Curriculum as a model for medical resident education for ophthalmologists at Saarland University Medical Center].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2017Article
- [Evaluation of a new residency program at the department of ophthalmology of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe main purpose of the present survey was to describe the situation of residents in ophthalmology in Germany, including professional aims and plans for the future. By evaluating the current conditions, potential deficits should be identified which could lead to demand-oriented approaches for improvement.
methodsThe online questionnaire was sent out per e-mail to 1100 German residents. The rate of received answers was 30.1 % (334 completed questionnaires).
resultsOf the participants 68 % were female,32 % were male (mean age 31.8 years), one third of the participants had children, 44.6 % worked at university institutions, 54.4 % at non-university institutions and 45.5 % considered themselves as well-trained. Deficits during residency training were seen in the field of neuro-ophthalmology and ophthalmic surgery. The evaluation of the residency in total revealed an overall average grade of 2.9 ("satisfactory"). Of the physicians 35.5 % reported to be actively involved in research projects and 21.9 % reported pursuing an academic career. Almost 50 % of the participant residents aimed to work in a private practice after residency and 15 % aimed to work at an university hospital.
conclusionThe present survey revealed representative data because of the acceptable return rate and participating residents from all different educational levels (1st to 5th year). The survey can therefore help to characterize the current situation of residents in ophthalmology in Germany and to develop demand-oriented possibilities for improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26014052What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.