ArticleGenome biology2015
Integrative modeling reveals the principles of multi-scale chromatin boundary formation in human nuclear organization.
Article in Genome biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- DeCTCF: Decoding CTCF binding sequences by leveraging predicted epigenomic features.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- THC-net: an attention-based deep learning model for chromatin compartment prediction from histone modifications.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Generating three-dimensional genome structures with a variational quantum algorithm.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Predicting 3D Genome Organization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Metabolism-related biomarkers, molecular classification, and immune infiltration in diabetic ulcers with validation.International wound journal · 2023Article
- TADreg: a versatile regression framework for TAD identification, differential analysis and rearranged 3D genome prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Pre-configuring chromatin architecture with histone modifications guides hematopoietic stem cell formation in mouse embryos.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Classification and biomarker gene selection of pyroptosis-related gene expression in psoriasis using a random forest algorithm.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- PredTAD: A machine learning framework that models 3D chromatin organization alterations leading to oncogene dysregulation in breast cancer cell lines.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Hierarchical chromatin organization detected by TADpole.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Article
- Quantitative prediction of enhancer-promoter interactions.Genome research · 2020Article
- In silico prediction of high-resolution Hi-C interaction matrices.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Chromosome territories and the global regulation of the genome.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2019Review
- Identification of Cancer Drivers at CTCF Insulators in 1,962 Whole Genomes.Cell systems · 2019Article
- Article
- Modeling double strand break susceptibility to interrogate structural variation in cancer.Genome biology · 2019Article
- CTCF maintains regulatory homeostasis of cancer pathways.Genome biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInterphase chromosomes adopt a hierarchical structure, and recent data have characterized their chromatin organization at very different scales, from sub-genic regions associated with DNA-binding proteins at the order of tens or hundreds of bases, through larger regions with active or repressed chromatin states, up to multi-megabase-scale domains associated with nuclear positioning, replication timing and other qualities. However, we have lacked detailed, quantitative models to understand the interactions between these different strata.
resultsHere we collate large collections of matched locus-level chromatin features and Hi-C interaction data, representing higher-order organization, across three human cell types. We use quantitative modeling approaches to assess whether locus-level features are sufficient to explain higher-order structure, and identify the most influential underlying features. We identify structurally variable domains between cell types and examine the underlying features to discover a general association with cell-type-specific enhancer activity. We also identify the most prominent features marking the boundaries of two types of higher-order domains at different scales: topologically associating domains and nuclear compartments. We find parallel enrichments of particular chromatin features for both types, including features associated with active promoters and the architectural proteins CTCF and YY1.
conclusionsWe show that integrative modeling of large chromatin dataset collections using random forests can generate useful insights into chromosome structure. The models produced recapitulate known biological features of the cell types involved, allow exploration of the antecedents of higher-order structures and generate testable hypotheses for further experimental studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.