Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26013703›Full record

SynthesisCNS drugs2015

Levetiracetam Monotherapy in Children with Epilepsy: A Systematic Review.

Amerins Weijenberg, Oebele F Brouwer, Petra M C Callenbach

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CNS drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Regulation of Inflammation-Related Genes throughInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amerins WeijenbergDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, AB 51, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Oebele F BrouwerDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, AB 51, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Petra M C CallenbachDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, AB 51, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. p.m.c.tijink@umcg.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLevetiracetam, a second-generation anti-epileptic drug (AED) with a good efficacy and safety profile, is licensed as monotherapy for adults and children older than 16 years with focal seizures with or without secondary generalization. However, it is increasingly being used off-label in younger children.

objectivesWe critically reviewed the available evidence and discuss the present status of levetiracetam monotherapy in children 0-16 years old. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched the literature using PubMed, Web of Science and Embase up to August 2014 for articles on levetiracetam monotherapy in children. Keywords were levetiracetam, monotherapy and child*. The titles and abstracts of 532 articles were evaluated by AW, of which 480 were excluded. The full texts of the other 52 articles were assessed for relevance.

resultsWe covered one review, one opinion statement and 32 studies in this review, including four randomized controlled trials, ten open-label prospective studies, eight retrospective studies, and ten case reports. The formal evidence for levetiracetam monotherapy in children is minimal: it is potentially efficacious or effective as initial monotherapy in children with benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes. In all of the published studies, however, efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam seemed to be good and comparable to other AEDs.

conclusionThe data of 32 studies on levetiracetam monotherapy in children were insufficient to confirm that levetiracetam is effective as initial monotherapy for different types of seizures and/or epilepsy syndromes. There is still an urgent need for well designed trials to justify the widespread use of levetiracetam monotherapy in children of all ages.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnticonvulsantsChildChild, PreschoolEpilepsyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLevetiracetamPiracetamRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnticonvulsantsLevetiracetamPiracetam

Identifiers

PMID26013703
PMCPMC4469086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.