Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26013599›Full record

ArticleMolecular carcinogenesis2016

Functional characterization of RAD52 as a lung cancer susceptibility gene in the 12p13.33 locus.

Rachel Lieberman, Donghai Xiong, Michael James, Younghun Han, Christopher I Amos, Liang Wang, Ming You

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular carcinogenesis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cancers · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Decade of GWAS Results in Lung Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel LiebermanDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology and Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Donghai XiongDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology and Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Michael JamesDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology and Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Younghun HanDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Christopher I AmosDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Liang WangDepartment of Pathology and Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Ming YouDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology and Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Medical College of Wisconsin · USDartmouth College · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Transdisciplinary Research in Cancer of the Lung (TRICL)U19CA148127 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I., LE MARCHAND, LOIC · 2010 to 2014
$10.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148127NCI NIH HHS U19CA148127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent genome-wide association studies have identified variations in the recombination repair gene, RAD52, that are associated with increased lung cancer risk, and particularly with the development of lung squamous cell carcinomas (LUSC). As LUSC development is strongly associated with smoking, DNA repair is increased in the lung tissues of smokers, presumably because of ongoing DNA damage from exposure to tobacco smoke. A key player in the DNA damage response, RAD52 plays a role in DNA strand exchange and annealing during homologous recombination (HR) in mammalian cells. In this study, we discovered two cis-expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) SNPs in the RAD52 gene that are associated with its expression and are also associated with LUSC risk. In addition, we report that amplification of the genomic region 12p13.33, which contains the RAD52 gene, is significantly associated with the development of LUSC in the TCGA database and that somatic overexpression of RAD52 was confirmed to be significant in LUSC tumors from our own patient cohort. Consistent with these genetic findings, we demonstrate that blockade of Rad52 slows cell growth and induces senescence in mouse bronchial epithelial cells. In contrast, overexpression of Rad52 leads to an increased rate of cell proliferation. We show that depletion of Rad52 in mouse lung tumor cells alters cell cycle distribution and increases DNA damage accumulation associated with increased tumor cell death. Our genetic and functional data implicate RAD52 as a significant determinant of risk in the development of LUSC.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationChromosomes, Human, Pair 12DNA DamageGene AmplificationGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLung NeoplasmsMiceNeoplasm TransplantationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinWhite PeopleRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinRAD52 protein, humancancer susceptibility geneDNA damageeQTLgene amplificationlung cancernon-small cell lung carcinomasenescence

Identifiers

PMID26013599
PMCPMC4662629
OpenAlexW2130764500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.