Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26013542›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmacology2015

Role of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinases 2 and 3 in μ-Opioid Receptor Desensitization and Internalization.

Janet D Lowe, Helen S Sanderson, Alexandra E Cooke, Mehrnoosh Ostovar, Elena Tsisanova, Sarah L Withey, Charles Chavkin, Stephen M Husbands, Eamonn Kelly, Graeme Henderson and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. G-protein regulatory network governs receptor internalization dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Histamine HPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Histamine HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Janet D LoweSchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (J.D.L., H.S.S., A.E.C., E.T., S.L.W., E.K., G.H.); Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (C.C.); and Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom (M.O., S.M.H., C.P.B.).
Helen S SandersonSchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (J.D.L., H.S.S., A.E.C., E.T., S.L.W., E.K., G.H.); Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (C.C.); and Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom (M.O., S.M.H., C.P.B.).
Alexandra E CookeSchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (J.D.L., H.S.S., A.E.C., E.T., S.L.W., E.K., G.H.); Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (C.C.); and Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom (M.O., S.M.H., C.P.B.).
Mehrnoosh OstovarSchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (J.D.L., H.S.S., A.E.C., E.T., S.L.W., E.K., G.H.); Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (C.C.); and Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom (M.O., S.M.H., C.P.B.).
Elena TsisanovaSchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (J.D.L., H.S.S., A.E.C., E.T., S.L.W., E.K., G.H.); Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (C.C.); and Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom (M.O., S.M.H., C.P.B.).
Sarah L WitheySchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (J.D.L., H.S.S., A.E.C., E.T., S.L.W., E.K., G.H.); Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (C.C.); and Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom (M.O., S.M.H., C.P.B.).
Charles ChavkinSchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (J.D.L., H.S.S., A.E.C., E.T., S.L.W., E.K., G.H.); Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (C.C.); and Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom (M.O., S.M.H., C.P.B.).
Stephen M HusbandsSchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (J.D.L., H.S.S., A.E.C., E.T., S.L.W., E.K., G.H.); Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (C.C.); and Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom (M.O., S.M.H., C.P.B.).
Eamonn KellySchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (J.D.L., H.S.S., A.E.C., E.T., S.L.W., E.K., G.H.); Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (C.C.); and Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom (M.O., S.M.H., C.P.B.).
Graeme HendersonSchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (J.D.L., H.S.S., A.E.C., E.T., S.L.W., E.K., G.H.); Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (C.C.); and Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom (M.O., S.M.H., C.P.B.).
Chris P BaileySchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (J.D.L., H.S.S., A.E.C., E.T., S.L.W., E.K., G.H.); Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (C.C.); and Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom (M.O., S.M.H., C.P.B.) c.p.bailey@bath.ac.uk.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

p38 MAPK Mechanisms of Kappa Opioid-Induced BehaviorsR01DA030074 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CHAVKIN, CHARLES · 2011 to 2020
$3.2M
Medical Research Council MR/J013269/1NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is ongoing debate about the role of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) in agonist-induced desensitization of the μ-opioid receptor (MOPr) in brain neurons. In the present paper, we have used a novel membrane-permeable, small-molecule inhibitor of GRK2 and GRK3, Takeda compound 101 (Cmpd101; 3-[[[4-methyl-5-(4-pyridyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3-yl] methyl] amino]-N-[2-(trifuoromethyl) benzyl] benzamidehydrochloride), to study the involvement of GRK2/3 in acute agonist-induced MOPr desensitization. We observed that Cmpd101 inhibits the desensitization of the G protein-activated inwardly-rectifying potassium current evoked by receptor-saturating concentrations of methionine-enkephalin (Met-Enk), [d-Ala(2), N-MePhe(4), Gly-ol(5)]-enkephalin (DAMGO), endomorphin-2, and morphine in rat and mouse locus coeruleus (LC) neurons. In LC neurons from GRK3 knockout mice, Met-Enk-induced desensitization was unaffected, implying a role for GRK2 in MOPr desensitization. Quantitative analysis of the loss of functional MOPrs following acute agonist exposure revealed that Cmpd101 only partially reversed MOPr desensitization. Inhibition of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, protein kinase C, c-Jun N-terminal kinase, or GRK5 did not inhibit the Cmpd101-insensitive component of desensitization. In HEK 293 cells, Cmpd101 produced almost complete inhibition of DAMGO-induced MOPr phosphorylation at Ser(375), arrestin translocation, and MOPr internalization. Our data demonstrate a role for GRK2 (and potentially also GRK3) in agonist-induced MOPr desensitization in the LC, but leave open the possibility that another, as yet unidentified, mechanism of desensitization also exists.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzamidesEnkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 3HEK293 CellsHumansLocus CoeruleusMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRatsRats, WistarReceptors, Opioid, muBenzamidesEnkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 3Receptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID26013542
PMCPMC4518089
OpenAlexW2137595253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.