Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26013284›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Cooperative transmembrane penetration of nanoparticles.

Haizhen Zhang, Qiuju Ji, Changjin Huang, Sulin Zhang, Bing Yuan, Kai Yang, Yu-qiang Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Translocation of TiRSC advances · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Critical considerations for targeting colorectal liver metastases with nanotechnology.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2020
    Review
  12. RSC advances · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Interrogating Cellular Functions with Designer Janus Particles.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Haizhen ZhangCenter for Soft Condensed Matter Physics and Interdisciplinary Research, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
Qiuju JiCenter for Soft Condensed Matter Physics and Interdisciplinary Research, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
Changjin HuangDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.
Sulin ZhangDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.
Bing YuanCenter for Soft Condensed Matter Physics and Interdisciplinary Research, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
Kai YangCenter for Soft Condensed Matter Physics and Interdisciplinary Research, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
Yu-qiang Ma1] Center for Soft Condensed Matter Physics and Interdisciplinary Research, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China [2] Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures and Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, China.
Soochow University · CNPennsylvania State University · USNanjing University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical penetration of lipid bilayer membranes presents an alternative pathway for cellular delivery of nanoparticles (NPs) besides endocytosis. NPs delivered through this pathway could reach the cytoplasm, thereby opening the possibility of organelle-specific targeting. Herein we perform dissipative particle dynamics simulations to elucidate the transmembrane penetration mechanisms of multiple NPs. Our simulations demonstrate that NPs' translocation proceeds in a cooperative manner, where the interplay of the quantity and surface chemistry of the NPs regulates the translocation efficiency. For NPs with hydrophilic surfaces, the increase of particle quantity facilitates penetration, while for NPs with partly or totally hydrophobic surfaces, the opposite highly possibly holds. Moreover, a set of interesting cooperative ways, such as aggregation, aggregation-dispersion, and aggregation-dispersion-reaggregation of the NPs, are observed during the penetration process. We find that the penetration behaviors of multiple NPs are mostly dominated by the changes of the NP-membrane force components in the membrane plane direction, in addition to that in the penetration direction, suggesting a different interaction mechanism between the multiple NPs and the membrane compared with the one-NP case. These results provide a fundamental understanding in the underlying mechanisms of cooperative penetration of NPs, and shed light on the NP-based drug and gene delivery.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsLipid BilayersNanoparticlesLipid Bilayers

Identifiers

PMID26013284
PMCPMC4444962
OpenAlexW2266260738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.