ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2015
What Risk Factors Are Associated With Musculoskeletal Injury in US Army Rangers? A Prospective Prognostic Study.
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Body mass index and physical training-related injuries in military personnel: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.BMJ military health · 2025Pooled it
- Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in military personnel: a systematic review with meta-analysis.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021Pooled it
- Exercise Programs to Reduce the Risk of Musculoskeletal Injuries in Military Personnel: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2020Pooled it
- Can Baseline Recruit Characteristics Predict Actual Injuries Sustained During New Zealand Army Basic Training?Military medicine · 2026Article
- Time to First Injury After Knee Surgery in U.S. Army Soldiers: A Survival Analysis.Sports medicine - open · 2025Article
- The Use of Force Plate Technology to Measure Force Production Characteristics in Military Personnel: A Scoping Review of Methodological Reporting Practices.Sports medicine - open · 2025Review
- Predictive Utility of the Functional Movement Screen and Y-Balance Test: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Movement Clearing Screens for Military Service Member Musculoskeletal Injury Risk Identification.Journal of athletic training · 2025Article
- Predictive Validity of Multifactorial Injury Risk Models and Associated Clinical Measures in the U.S. Population.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Chronic Ankle Instability and Neuromuscular Performance in Prerecruitment Infantry Soldiers.Journal of athletic training · 2024Article
- Risk Factors for Musculoskeletal Health: A Review of the Literature and Clinical Application.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2024Article
- Profiles of Recruits Entering Army Basic Training in New Zealand.Military medicine · 2023Article
- Musculoskeletal Injury Risk Stratification: A Traffic Light System for Military Service Members.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Financial Impact of Embedded Injury-Prevention Experts in US Army Initial Entry Training.Journal of athletic training · 2023Article
- The Utility of Myotonometry in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation and Human Performance Programming.Journal of athletic training · 2023Review
- Self-Movement Screening using the Symmio Application is Reliable and Valid for Identifying Musculoskeletal Risk Factors.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2023Article
- Pre-neuromusculoskeletal injury Risk factor Evaluation and Post-neuromusculoskeletal injury Assessment for Return-to-duty/activity Enhancement (PREPARE) in military service members: a prospective, observational study protocol.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Effects of Yoga Intervention on Functional Movement Patterns and Mindfulness in Collegiate Athletes: A Quasi-Experimental Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Integration of strength training into UK Defence Rehabilitation practice: current trends and future challenges.BMJ military health · 2022Article
- Risk factors for injuries in female soldiers: a systematic review.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMusculoskeletal injury is the most common reason that soldiers are medically not ready to deploy. Understanding intrinsic risk factors that may place an elite soldier at risk of musculoskeletal injury may be beneficial in preventing musculoskeletal injury and maintaining operational military readiness. Findings from this population may also be useful as hypothesis-generating work for particular civilian settings such as law enforcement officers (SWAT teams), firefighters (smoke jumpers), or others in physically demanding professions. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to examine whether using baseline measures of self-report and physical performance can identify musculoskeletal injury risk; and (2) to determine whether a combination of predictors would enhance the accuracy for determining future musculoskeletal injury risk in US Army Rangers.
methodsOur study was a planned secondary analysis from a prospective cohort examining how baseline factors predict musculoskeletal injury. Baseline predictors associated with musculoskeletal injury were collected using surveys and physical performance measures. Survey data included demographic variables, injury history, and biopsychosocial questions. Physical performance measures included ankle dorsiflexion, Functional Movement Screen, lower and upper quarter Y-balance test, hop testing, pain provocation, and the Army Physical Fitness Test (consisting of a 2-mile run and 2 minutes of sit-ups and push-ups). A total of 320 Rangers were invited to enroll and 211 participated (66%). Occurrence of musculoskeletal injury was tracked for 1 year using monthly injury surveillance surveys, medical record reviews, and a query of the Department of Defense healthcare utilization database. Injury surveillance data were available on 100% of the subjects. Receiver operator characteristic curves and accuracy statistics were calculated to identify predictors of interest. A logistic regression equation was then calculated to find the most pertinent set of predictors. Of the 188 Rangers (age, 23.3 ± 3.7 years; body mass index, 26.0 ± 2.4 kg/m(2)) remaining in the cohort, 85 (45.2%) sustained a musculoskeletal injury of interest.
resultsSmoking, prior surgery, recurrent prior musculoskeletal injury, limited-duty days in the prior year for musculoskeletal injury, asymmetrical ankle dorsiflexion, pain with Functional Movement Screen clearing tests, and decreased performance on the 2-mile run and 2-minute sit-up test were associated with increased injury risk. Presenting with one or fewer predictors resulted in a sensitivity of 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.95), and having three or more predictors resulted in a specificity of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99). The combined factors that contribute to the final multivariable logistic regression equation yielded an odds ratio of 4.3 (95% CI, 2.0-9.2), relative risk of 1.9 (95% CI, 1.4-2.6), and an area under the curve of 0.64.
conclusionsMultiple factors (musculoskeletal injury history, smoking, pain provocation, movement tests, and lower scores on physical performance measures) were associated with individuals at risk for musculoskeletal injury. The summation of the number of risk factors produced a highly sensitive (one or less factor) and specific (three or more factors) model that could potentially be used to effectively identify and intervene in those persons with elevated risk for musculoskeletal injury. Future research should establish if screening and intervening can improve musculoskeletal health and if our findings among US Army Rangers translate to other occupations or athletes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.