Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26013020›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2015

[Ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block. Anatomical study].

R Seidel, M Schulze, K Zukowski, A Wree

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Cervical plexus block.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R SeidelKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, HELIOS-Kliniken Schwerin, Wismarsche Str. 393-397, 19049, Schwerin, Deutschland, ronald.seidel@helios-kliniken.de.
M Schulze
K Zukowski
A Wree

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe innervation of the human cervical region is complex and subject to relevant anatomical variability involving sections of the cervical plexus, brachial plexus and cranial nerves.

aimThe objective was to demonstrate the dissemination of injected dye solution by anatomical preparation and to define a suitable target compartment for an ultrasound-guided block technique. MATERIAL AND

methodsOwn anatomical preparations are compared to recent review articles on the subject. The focus is on clinically relevant conclusions for performing cervical plexus blocks. In three non-embalmed cadavers six intermediate ultrasound-guided blocks of the cervical plexus were carried out, each with 20 ml methylene blue. Following preparation of the cervical plexus photographic documentation of the spread of the injected marker was performed.

resultsIn five cases the target compartment was correctly identified. In these cases, a cranio-caudal spread of the injectate within the double layer of the cervical fascia was observed. In addition, the superficial layer was permeable to the injected methylene blue. The injection solution disseminated with the sensitive terminal branches of the cervical plexus below the platysma. In all cases an anastomosis (superficial cervical ansa) between the facial nerve (ramus colli) and the cervical plexus (transverse cervical nerve) could be demonstrated. The prevertebral lamina proved to be impermeable to injected methylene blue and no evidence of a porous structure of the prevertebral lamina was found.

conclusionThe compartment between the superficial and the prevertebral layer of the cervical fascia is a suitable target for cervical plexus blocks. This injection site describes an intermediate cervical plexus block. As the compartment contains the sensory terminal branches of the spinal nerves C2-4, it may be referred to as C2-C4 compartment. The cranio-caudal spread of the injectate allows lateromedial needle guidance in the horizontal plane. As the superficial lamina is not a barrier to the injectate an additional subcutaneous infiltration of the nerve area appears dispensable. The prevertebral lamina proved to be impermeable to injected methylene blue. Whether phrenic nerve blocks are preventable with more distal intermediate cervical plexus blocks (selective block of the supraclavicular nerves, e.g. for surgery of the clavicle) must be investigated in clinical trials. The permanent anastomosis (superficial cervical ansa) between the cervical plexus and the ramus colli of the facial nerve provides an anatomically reasonable explanation for inadequate cervical plexus blocks.

Indexed as

Anatomic LandmarksAnesthesia, ConductionCadaverCervical PlexusCervical Plexus BlockCervical VertebraeColoring AgentsFacial NerveHumansMethylene BlueSpinal NervesUltrasonography, InterventionalColoring AgentsMethylene Blue

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.