Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26012642›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2016

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of very low stress-dose with standard-dose myocardial perfusion imaging: Automated quantification of one-day, stress-first SPECT using a CZT camera.

Tali Sharir, Marina Pinskiy, Abraham Pardes, Arik Rochman, Vitali Prokhorov, Gil Kovalski, Konstantine Merzon, Andrzej Bojko, Boris Brodkin

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Low-dose gated bloodpool SPECT: Is it time to make the shift?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  6. OptimalJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Effect of reduced photon count levels and choice of normal data on semi-automated image assessment in cardiac SPECT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  8. Quantitative Clinical Nuclear Cardiology, Part 1: Established Applications.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Review
  9. Quantitative Clinical Nuclear Cardiology, Part 1: Established Applications.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Advances in imaging instrumentation for nuclear cardiology.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. What is the value of motion and thickening in gated myocardial perfusion SPECT?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  15. The time is now: Dose reduction for myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  16. PET should not replace routine SPECT MPS for the assessment of patients with known or suspected CAD.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the journal of nuclear cardiology in 2016: Part 2 of 2-myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Review
  19. A world view of nuclear cardiology practices: Think globally, act locally.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  20. Multicenter evaluation of stress-first myocardial perfusion image triage by nuclear technologists and automated quantification.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tali SharirDepartment of Nuclear Cardiology, Assuta Medical Centers, 96 Igal Alon, C Building, 67891, Tel Aviv, Israel. tsharir@gmail.com.
Marina PinskiyDepartment of Nuclear Cardiology, Assuta Medical Centers, 96 Igal Alon, C Building, 67891, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Abraham PardesDepartment of Nuclear Cardiology, Assuta Medical Centers, 96 Igal Alon, C Building, 67891, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Arik RochmanDepartment of Nuclear Cardiology, Assuta Medical Centers, 96 Igal Alon, C Building, 67891, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Vitali ProkhorovDepartment of Nuclear Cardiology, Assuta Medical Centers, 96 Igal Alon, C Building, 67891, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Gil KovalskiGeneral Electric Healthcare, Haifa, Israel.
Konstantine MerzonDepartment of Nuclear Cardiology, Assuta Medical Centers, 96 Igal Alon, C Building, 67891, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Andrzej BojkoDepartment of Nuclear Cardiology, Assuta Medical Centers, 96 Igal Alon, C Building, 67891, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Boris BrodkinDepartment of Nuclear Cardiology, Assuta Medical Centers, 96 Igal Alon, C Building, 67891, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have demonstrated accurate diagnosis of reduced dose myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride (CZT) technology. We compared the diagnostic performances of very low stress-dose (<2 mSv) with standard-dose stress-first, quantitative MPI using a CZT camera.

methodsPatients without known coronary artery- disease who underwent a stress-first Tc-99 m sestamibi CZT-MPI and invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and low-risk patients without ICA were included. A stress-rest standard-dose (10/30 mCi) MPI and a low-dose (5/15 mCi) MPI were compared. Normal limits for quantification were developed from 40 (20 males) low-risk patients, and total perfusion deficit (TPD) was derived.

results208 patients who underwent MPI and ICA, and 76 low-risk patients were included. Of these, 128 had a standard-dose MPI and 156 had a low-dose MPI. Stress-doses in low-dose and standard-dose groups were 5.9 ± 1.2 vs 10.2 ± 0.5 mCi (1.7 ± 0.3 vs 3.0 ± 0.1 mSv), respectively, P < 0.001, and stress-rest effective radiation was 6.9 ± 1.1 vs 11.7 ± 0.4 mSv, respectively, P < 0.001. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values in the low-dose and standard-dose groups were 86.1%, 76.6%, and 81.4%; and 90.6%, 78.1%, and 84.4%, respectively, P = ns. Using TPD prone, specificity values were 84.9% and 80.3%, respectively, P = ns.

conclusionOne-day stress-first MPI with 50% radiation reduction and a very low stress-dose (<2 mSv) using CZT technology and quantitative supine and prone analysis provided a high diagnostic value, similar to standard-dose MPI.

Indexed as

Gamma CamerasCoronary Artery DiseaseDose-Response Relationship, DrugEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisExercise TestFemaleHumansImage EnhancementMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPattern Recognition, AutomatedRadiopharmaceuticalsReproducibility of ResultsRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m Sestamibiautomatic quantificationcoronary artery diseaseCZT cameralow-doseMyocardial perfusion imagingstress-first

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.