ArticlePloS one2015
Different timing features in brain processing of core and moral disgust pictures: an event-related potentials study.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing Brain Responses to Moral and Semantic Violations.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- The Electrocortical Effects of Repurposing and Reconstrual on the Regulation of Disgust.PsyCh journal · 2025Article
- The "moral neutrality pattern" of individuals with indirect multicultural experiences in immoral and moral judgments: behavioral and neural evidence.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Imprint of ancestral and modern threats in human mind - experience of fear, disgust, and anger.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Effects of mindfulness and fatigue on emotional processing: an event-related potentials study.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023Article
- Effects of Core Disgust and Moral Disgust on Moral Judgment: An Event-Related Potential Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Different influences of moral violation with and without physical impurity on face processing: An event-related potentials study.PloS one · 2020Article
- The sound and the fury: Late positive potential is sensitive to sound affect.Psychophysiology · 2017Article
- Individual differences in the early recognition of moral information in lexical processing: An event-related potential study.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Mechanisms for attentional modulation by threatening emotions of fear, anger, and disgust.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disgust, an emotion motivating withdrawal from offensive stimuli, protects us from the risk of biological pathogens and sociomoral violations. Homogeneity of its two types, namely, core and moral disgust has been under intensive debate. To examine the dynamic relationship between them, we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) for core disgust, moral disgust and neutral pictures while participants performed a modified oddball task. ERP analysis revealed that N1 and P2 amplitudes were largest for the core disgust pictures, indicating automatic processing of the core disgust-evoking pictures. N2 amplitudes were higher for pictures evoking moral disgust relative to core disgust and neutral pictures, reflecting a violation of social norms. The core disgust pictures elicited larger P3 and late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes in comparison with the moral disgust pictures which, in turn, elicited larger P3 and LPP amplitudes when compared to the neutral pictures. Taken together, these findings indicated that core and moral disgust pictures elicited different neural activities at various stages of information processing, which provided supporting evidence for the heterogeneity of disgust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.