Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26011609›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Childhood adversity as a predictor of non-adherence to statin therapy in adulthood.

Maarit Jaana Korhonen, Jaana I Halonen, M Alan Brookhart, Ichiro Kawachi, Jaana Pentti, Hasse Karlsson, Mika Kivimäki, Jussi Vahtera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Relationships among adverse childhood experiences, delay discounting, impulsivity, and diabetes self-management.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Maarit Jaana KorhonenDepartment of Pharmacology, Drug Development and Therapeutics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Jaana I HalonenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
M Alan BrookhartDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Ichiro KawachiHarvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jaana PenttiFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Turku, Finland.
Hasse KarlssonDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Mika KivimäkiDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College of London, London, United Kingdom.
Jussi VahteraDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
University of Turku · FIFinnish Institute of Occupational Health · FILondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBTurku University Hospital · FIUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/13/2/30098Medical Research Council K013351Medical Research Council MR/K013351/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate whether adverse experiences in childhood predict non-adherence to statin therapy in adulthood.

methodsA cohort of 1378 women and 538 men who initiated statin therapy during 2008-2010 after responding to a survey on childhood adversities, was followed for non-adherence during the first treatment year. Log-binomial regression was used to estimate predictors of non-adherence, defined as the proportion of days covered by dispensed statin tablets <80%. In fully adjusted models including age, education, marital status, current smoking, heavy alcohol use, physical inactivity, obesity, presence of depression and cardiovascular comorbidity, the number of women ranged from 1172 to 1299 and that of men from 473 to 516, because of missing data on specific adversities and covariates.

resultsTwo in three respondents reported at least one of the following six adversities in the family: divorce/separation of the parents, long-term financial difficulties, severe conflicts, frequent fear, severe illness, or alcohol problem of a family member. 51% of women and 44% of men were non-adherent. In men, the number of childhood adversities predicted an increased risk of non-adherence (risk ratio [RR] per adversity 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.21], P for linear trend 0.013). Compared with those reporting no adversities, men reporting 3-6 adversities had a 1.44-fold risk of non-adherence (95% CI 1.12-1.85). Experiencing severe conflicts in the family (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.03-1.57]) and frequent fear of a family member (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.00-1.62]) in particular, predicted an increased risk of non-adherence. In women, neither the number of adversities nor any specific type of adversity predicted non-adherence.

conclusionsExposure to childhood adversity may predict non-adherence to preventive cardiovascular medication in men. Usefulness of information on childhood adversities in identification of adults at high risk of non-adherence deserves further research.

Indexed as

Life Change EventsAdultAdult Survivors of Child AbuseAgedFamilyFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypercholesterolemiaMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSex FactorsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26011609
PMCPMC4444303
OpenAlexW1500299850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.