Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26010975›Full record

ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2015

Development and initial evaluation of the SCI-FI/AT.

Alan M Jette, Mary D Slavin, Pengsheng Ni, Pamela A Kisala, David S Tulsky, Allen W Heinemann, Susie Charlifue, Denise G Tate, Denise Fyffe, Leslie Morse and 3 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Available Assistive Technology Outcome Measures: Systematic Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sensitivity of the SCI-FI/AT in Individuals With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alan M Jette
Mary D Slavin
Pengsheng Ni
Pamela A Kisala
David S Tulsky
Allen W Heinemann
Susie Charlifue
Denise G Tate
Denise Fyffe
Leslie Morse
Ralph Marino
Ian Smith
Steve Williams

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the domain structure and calibration of the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Index for samples using Assistive Technology (SCI-FI/AT) and report the initial psychometric properties of each domain.

designCross sectional survey followed by computerized adaptive test (CAT) simulations.

settingInpatient and community settings.

participantsA sample of 460 adults with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) stratified by level of injury, completeness of injury, and time since injury.

interventionsNone

main outcome measureSCI-FI/AT

resultsConfirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Item response theory (IRT) analyses identified 4 unidimensional SCI-FI/AT domains: Basic Mobility (41 items) Self-care (71 items), Fine Motor Function (35 items), and Ambulation (29 items). High correlations of full item banks with 10-item simulated CATs indicated high accuracy of each CAT in estimating a person's function, and there was high measurement reliability for the simulated CAT scales compared with the full item bank. SCI-FI/AT item difficulties in the domains of Self-care, Fine Motor Function, and Ambulation were less difficult than the same items in the original SCI-FI item banks.

conclusionWith the development of the SCI-FI/AT, clinicians and investigators have available multidimensional assessment scales that evaluate function for users of AT to complement the scales available in the original SCI-FI.

Indexed as

MovementQuality of LifeTrauma Severity IndicesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpinal Cord InjuriesSurveys and QuestionnairesOutcome assessment (health care)PsychometricsQuality of LifeRehabilitationSpinal cord injuries

Identifiers

PMID26010975
PMCPMC4445031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.