ArticleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2015
Data-prompted interviews: Using individual ecological data to stimulate narratives and explore meanings.
Article in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mobile Momentary Assessment and Biobehavioral Feedback for Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: Feasibility and Engagement Patterns.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2018Trial
- Qualitative Analysis of User Experiences of a mHealth Self-Care Intervention for Care Partners of Individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026Article
- Conversational, Longitudinal, Ecological Assessment (CLEA): Exploring a new AI-driven method for qualitative data collection in a behavioural health context.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Physical activity barriers and facilitators in patients awaiting spine surgery: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Linking physical activity to workers' low back pain, back health, and theory-based psychological variables: study protocol of the workHealth intensive longitudinal observational study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Humanizing processes after harm part 1: patient safety incident investigations, litigation and the experiences of those affected.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- Identifying Design Opportunities for Adaptive mHealth Interventions That Target General Well-Being: Interview Study With Informal Care Partners.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- From protection to non-protection: A mixed methods study investigating movement, posture and recovery from disabling low back pain.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2022Article
- Moving on From the Delphi Study: The Development of a Physical Activity Training Programme Prototype Through Co-produced Qualitative Research.Qualitative health research · 2022Article
- Disruption and adaptation in response to the coronavirus pandemic - Assets as contextual moderators of enactment of health behaviours.British journal of health psychology · 2022Article
- Using Mixed Methods to Assess the Coping and Self-regulation Skills of Undergraduate Social Work Students Impacted by COVID-19.Clinical social work journal · 2022Article
- Patient Work and Treatment Burden in Type 2 Diabetes: A Mixed-Methods Study.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2021Article
- Article
- An Exploratory Case Study of Mental Toughness Variability and Potential Influencers over 30 Days.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Adherence to medication in adults with Cystic Fibrosis: An investigation using objective adherence data and the Theoretical Domains Framework.British journal of health psychology · 2019Article
- A Context-Sensing Mobile Phone App (Q Sense) for Smoking Cessation: A Mixed-Methods Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2016Article
- Using Visual Methods to Understand Physical Activity Maintenance following Cardiac Rehabilitation.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAn emerging trend in qualitative research is to use individual participant data to stimulate narratives in interviews. This article describes the method of the data-prompted interview (DPI) and highlights its potential benefits and challenges.
methodDPIs use personal ecological data gathered prior to the interview to stimulate discussion during the interview. Various forms of data can be used including photographs, videos, audio recordings, graphs, and text. This data can be gathered by the researcher or generated by the participant and may utilize ecological momentary assessment.
resultsUsing individual data in DPIs can stimulate visual and auditory senses, enhance memory, and prompt rich narratives anchored in personal experiences. For the researcher, DPIs provide an opportunity to explore the meaning of the data and to explain data patterns. For the participant, presented stimuli give guidance for discussion and allow them to reflect. The challenges associated with conducting DPIs include practical issues such as data selection and presentation. Data analyses require narratives to be interpreted together with the data. Ethical challenges of DPI include concerns around data anonymity and sensitivity.
conclusionsCombining various sources of data to stimulate the interview provides a novel opportunity to enhance participants' memories and to meaningfully assess and analyze data patterns. In the context of health promotion and illness prevention, DPI offers a unique opportunity to explore reasons, opinions, and motivations for health-related behaviors in the light of previously gathered data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.