Trial reportCritical care medicine2015
Talactoferrin in Severe Sepsis: Results From the Phase II/III Oral tAlactoferrin in Severe sepsIS Trial.
Trial report in Critical care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in sepsis mortality over time in randomised sepsis trials: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of mortality in the control arm, 2002-2016.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Pooled it
- Enteral lactoferrin for the treatment of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Control groups in recent septic shock trials: a systematic review.Intensive care medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Mass cytometry reveals complex neutrophil heterogeneity in patients with severe sepsis.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Emerging antimicrobial therapies for Gram-negative infections in human clinical use.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2025Review
- The pathophysiology of sepsis and precision-medicine-based immunotherapy.Nature immunology · 2024Review
- Adaptive designs in critical care trials: a simulation study.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
- Nanoparticular and other carriers to deliver lactoferrin for antimicrobial, antibiofilm and bone-regenerating effects: a review.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2023Review
- Potential of Lactoferrin in the Treatment of Lung Diseases.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The End of "One Size Fits All" Sepsis Therapies: Toward an Individualized Approach.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- How to Combat Gram-Negative Bacteria Using Antimicrobial Peptides: A Challenge or an Unattainable Goal?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Bacterial Nosocomial Infections: Multidrug Resistance as a Trigger for the Development of Novel Antimicrobials.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Rediscovery of antimicrobial peptides as therapeutic agents.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2021Review
- Lactoferrin as potential preventative and adjunct treatment for COVID-19.International journal of antimicrobial agents · 2020Review
- Novel Anti-Inflammatory Approaches for Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease: Identification of Molecular Targets and Design of Innovative Therapies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Adaptive designs in clinical trials in critically ill patients: principles, advantages and pitfalls.Intensive care medicine · 2019Article
- Targeting the Blood-Brain Barrier to Prevent Sepsis-Associated Cognitive Impairment.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2019Review
- Lactoferrin: A Critical Player in Neonatal Host Defense.Nutrients · 2018Review
- VEN-120, a Recombinant Human Lactoferrin, Promotes a Regulatory T Cell [Treg] Phenotype and Drives Resolution of Inflammation in Distinct Murine Models of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTalactoferrin alfa is a recombinant form of the human glycoprotein, lactoferrin, which has been shown to have a wide range of effects on the immune system. This phase II/III clinical trial compared talactoferrin with placebo, in addition to standard of care, in patients with severe sepsis.
designMulticenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II/III clinical study.
settingSeventy-seven centers in 10 countries. PATIENTS: Adult (> 18 yr) patients admitted to one of the participating centers with severe sepsis who were receiving antimicrobial therapy and able to take liquid medication by mouth or feeding tube.
interventionsPatients were randomized to receive either talactoferrin (1.5 g, 15 mL) or placebo three times a day orally or by another enteral route for 28 days or until ICU discharge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsThe study was terminated after 305 patients had been enrolled (153 talactoferrin and 152 placebo) because of futility and safety concerns identified by the Data Safety Monitoring Board. There were no significant differences between groups in baseline characteristics including age, sex, site of infection, and severity scores. Twenty-eight-day mortality was higher in talactoferrin-treated patients although this difference was not statistically significant (24.8% vs 17.8% placebo; p = 0.117). The difference was largely the result of differences in patients with shock (talactoferrin, 33/105 [31.4%] vs placebo, 21/104 [20.2%]; p = 0.064); no mortality difference was seen in patients without shock (talactoferrin, 5/48 [10.4%] vs placebo, 6/48 [12.5%]; p = 0.806). In-hospital (43/153 [28.1%] vs 27/152 [17.8%]; p = 0.037) and 3-month (46/153 [30.1%] vs 31/152 [20.4%]; p = 0.036) mortality rates were significantly higher in talactoferrin-treated patients than in patients in the placebo group. The occurrence of treatment-related adverse or serious adverse events was similar between groups.
conclusionsAdministration of oral talactoferrin was not associated with reduced 28-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis and may even be harmful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.