Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26010445›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A First Generation Comparative Chromosome Map between Guinea Pig (Cavia porcellus) and Humans.

Svetlana A Romanenko, Polina L Perelman, Vladimir A Trifonov, Natalia A Serdyukova, Tangliang Li, Beiyuan Fu, Patricia C M O'Brien, Bee L Ng, Wenhui Nie, Thomas Liehr and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nontransgenic Guinea Pig Strains Exhibit Hallmarks of Human Brain Aging and Alzheimer's Disease.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Karyotype diversity suggests that Laonastes aenigmamus (Laotian rock rat) (Rodentia, Diatomyidae) is a multi-specific genus.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Svetlana A RomanenkoInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia; Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Polina L PerelmanInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia; Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Vladimir A TrifonovInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia; Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Natalia A SerdyukovaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Tangliang LiState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, PR China.
Beiyuan FuWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
Patricia C M O'BrienCentre for Veterinary Science, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Bee L NgWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
Wenhui NieState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, PR China.
Thomas LiehrJena University Hospital, Institute of Human Genetics and Anthropology, Jena, Germany.
Roscoe StanyonDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Alexander S GraphodatskyInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia; Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Fengtang YangWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology · RUWellcome Sanger Institute · GBChinese Academy of Sciences · CNJena University Hospital · DEKunming Institute of Zoology · CNNovosibirsk State University · RUSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RUUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The domesticated guinea pig, Cavia porcellus (Hystricomorpha, Rodentia), is an important laboratory species and a model for a number of human diseases. Nevertheless, genomic tools for this species are lacking; even its karyotype is poorly characterized. The guinea pig belongs to Hystricomorpha, a widespread and important group of rodents; so far the chromosomes of guinea pigs have not been compared with that of other hystricomorph species or with any other mammals. We generated full sets of chromosome-specific painting probes for the guinea pig by flow sorting and microdissection, and for the first time, mapped the chromosomal homologies between guinea pig and human by reciprocal chromosome painting. Our data demonstrate that the guinea pig karyotype has undergone extensive rearrangements: 78 synteny-conserved human autosomal segments were delimited in the guinea pig genome. The high rate of genome evolution in the guinea pig may explain why the HSA7/16 and HSA16/19 associations presumed ancestral for eutherians and the three syntenic associations (HSA1/10, 3/19, and 9/11) considered ancestral for rodents were not found in C. porcellus. The comparative chromosome map presented here is a starting point for further development of physical and genetic maps of the guinea pig as well as an aid for genome assembly assignment to specific chromosomes. Furthermore, the comparative mapping will allow a transfer of gene map data from other species. The probes developed here provide a genomic toolkit, which will make the guinea pig a key species to unravel the evolutionary biology of the Hystricomorph rodents.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingChromosome PaintingEvolution, MolecularGenome, HumanAnimalsChromosomes, HumanGuinea PigsHumansSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID26010445
PMCPMC4444286
OpenAlexW2099328322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.