Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26010432›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2016

Rethinking the concepts of 'local or global processors': evidence from Williams syndrome, Down syndrome, and Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Dean D'Souza, Rhonda Booth, Monica Connolly, Francesca Happé, Annette Karmiloff-Smith

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Reading comprehension improvement in autism.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dean D'SouzaBirkbeck Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, University of London, UK.
Rhonda BoothInstitute of Child Health, University College London, UK.
Monica ConnollyBirkbeck Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, University of London, UK.
Francesca HappéSocial, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK.
Annette Karmiloff-SmithBirkbeck Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, University of London, UK.
Birkbeck, University of London · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both Williams syndrome (WS) and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) have been characterized as preferentially processing local information, whereas in Down syndrome (DS) the reported tendency is to process stimuli globally. We designed a cross-syndrome, cross-task comparison to reveal similarities and differences in local/global processing in these disorders. Our in-depth study compared local/global processing across modalities (auditory-verbal/visuo-spatial) and levels of processing (high/low) in the three syndromes. Despite claims in the literature, participants with ASD or WS failed to show a consistent local processing bias, while those with DS failed to show a reliable global processing bias. Depending on the nature of the stimuli and the task, both local and global processing biases were evident in all three neurodevelopmental disorders. These findings indicate that individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders cannot simply be characterized as local or global processors.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAuditory PerceptionAutism Spectrum DisorderDown SyndromeFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsPsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionSpatial LearningVerbal LearningVisual PerceptionWilliams SyndromeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26010432
PMCPMC4789488
OpenAlexW2110892690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.