Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26010254›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Weight loss interventions for breast cancer survivors: impact of dietary pattern.

Henry J Thompson, Scot M Sedlacek, Mary C Playdon, Pamela Wolfe, John N McGinley, Devchand Paul, Susan G Lakoski

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01315483 (Diet Composition, Weight Control, and Breast Carcinogenesis), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01315483 nacompletednot on this map

Diet Composition, Weight Control, and Breast Carcinogenesis

TypeinterventionalSponsorColorado State UniversityRan2008 to 2012Enrolled259ConditionsBreast CancerArmsWeight Loss Dietary Pattern
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A qualitative evaluation of a group phone-based weight loss intervention for rural breast cancer survivors: Themes and mechanisms of success.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Henry J ThompsonCancer Prevention Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Scot M SedlacekCancer Prevention Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Mary C PlaydonCancer Prevention Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Pamela WolfeColorado Biostatistics Consortium, University of Colorado Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
John N McGinleyCancer Prevention Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Devchand PaulRocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Susan G LakoskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledBody weight management is not emphasized in clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer survivors, reflecting the lack of evidence that weight loss improves prognosis. Even if this situation changes, the optimal design for weight loss interventions is unclear. We conducted a 6-month non-randomized, controlled weight loss intervention in 249 post-menopausal breast cancer survivors. This paper reports effects on two secondary endpoints, change in body weight and composition. Participants were predominantly non-Hispanic whites (89%) with a mean age of 54.9 ± 9.2 years, a mean BMI of 29.0 ± 2.6 kg/m: (2) and an average of 43 ± 5% body fat. Two dietary interventions, low fat or low carbohydrate, were investigated and consisted of a 42 day cycle of menus and recipes. Weight loss counseling and anthropometric assessment were provided at monthly clinic visits. One hundred ninety-two women completed the trial (77% retention). In comparison to the nonintervention control, both intervention arms achieved significant decreases in body weight (12.5%), body fat (27.5%), waist circumference (9.5%), and hip circumference (7.8%) (all p < 0.001) with minimal effects on lean mass (1.3% decrease). Median time to 5 and 10% weight loss was 2 (95% confidence interval = 1 to 3) and 4 (95% confidence interval = 3 to 5) months, respectively, and 23% of participants experienced ≥ 15% weight loss. Loss of body weight and fat mass was rapid and substantial irrespective of dietary approach when a structured program was provided with monthly anthropometric assessment and weight loss counseling.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01315483.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueBody CompositionBody Mass IndexBody WeightBreast NeoplasmsDiet, Fat-RestrictedFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSurvivorsWaist CircumferenceWeight Loss

Identifiers

PMID26010254
PMCPMC4443974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.