Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26010087›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Variability in the practice of fertility preservation for patients with cancer.

Kasey A Reynolds, Natalia M Grindler, Julie S Rhee, Amber R Cooper, Valerie S Ratts, Kenneth R Carson, Emily S Jungheim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase: systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Impact of letrozole supplementation during ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kasey A ReynoldsDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Natalia M GrindlerDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Julie S RheeDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Amber R CooperDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Valerie S RattsDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Kenneth R CarsonDivision of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America; Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America; Research Service, St. Louis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Emily S JungheimDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Washington University in St. Louis · USSt. Louis VA Medical Center · US

Funding

A National Training Program in Reproductive MedicineT32HD040135 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COUTIFARIS, CHRISTOS · 2002 to 2016
$3.6M
Women's Reproductive Health Research Career Development Program at W.U., St LouisK12HD063086 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MACONES, GEORGE A · 2009 to 2013
$2.6M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD063086NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD0040135NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD040135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fertility is important to women and men with cancer. While options for fertility preservation (FP) are available, knowledge regarding the medical application of FP is lacking. Therefore we examined FP practices for cancer patients among reproductive endocrinologists (REs). A 36 item survey was sent to board-certified REs. 98% of respondents reported counseling women with cancer about FP options. Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation were universally offered by these providers, but variability was noted in reported management of these cases-particularly for women with breast cancer. 86% of the respondents reported using letrozole during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in patients with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer to minimize patient exposure to estrogen. 49% of respondents who reported using letrozole in COS for patients with ER+ breast cancer reported that they would also use letrozole in COS for women with ER negative breast cancer. Variability was also noted in the management of FP for men with cancer. 83% of participants reported counseling men about sperm banking with 22% recommending against banking for men previously exposed to chemotherapy. Overall, 79% of respondents reported knowledge of American Society for Clinical Oncology FP guidelines-knowledge that was associated with providers offering gonadal tissue cryopreservation (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.14-2.90). These findings demonstrate that RE management of FP in cancer patients varies. Although some variability may be dictated by local resources, standardization of FP practices and communication with treating oncologists may help ensure consistent recommendations and outcomes for patients seeking FP.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationContraceptionCryopreservationDemographyFemaleHumansMaleMenstrual CycleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOvaryOvulation InductionReproductive Techniques, Assisted

Identifiers

PMID26010087
PMCPMC4444257
OpenAlexW427013684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.