Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26010049›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2015

Factor Structure of Subjective Responses to Alcohol in Light and Heavy Drinkers.

Spencer Bujarski, Kent E Hutchison, Daniel J O Roche, Lara A Ray

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Use of mindfulness training to improve BAC self-estimation during a drinking episode.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Moderators of subjective response to alcohol in the human laboratory.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Do behavioral pharmacology findings predict clinical trial outcomes? A proof-of-concept in medication development for alcohol use disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Spencer BujarskiDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Kent E HutchisonDepartment of Psychology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.
Daniel J O RocheDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Lara A RayDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
University of California, Los Angeles · USNeurobehavioral Systems · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Sensitivity to Intravenous Ethanol: Genetic DeterminantsR01AA015968 · NIAAA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI HUTCHISON, KENT E. · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
Subjective Response and Self-Administration of Alcohol in the Human LabF31AA022569 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BUJARSKI, SPENCER · 2014 to 2015
$69k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA022569NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubjective responses (SRs) to alcohol have been implicated in alcoholism etiology, yet less is known about the latent factor structure of alcohol responses. The aim of this study was to examine the factor structure of SR using a battery of self-report measures during a controlled alcohol challenge.

methodsNontreatment seeking drinkers (N = 242) completed an intravenous alcohol challenge including the following SR measures: Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale, Subjective High Assessment Scale, Profile of Mood States, Alcohol Urge Questionnaire, and single items assessing alcohol "Liking" and "Wanting." Ascending limb target breath alcohol concentrations were 0.02, 0.04, and 0.06, and descending limb target was 0.04 g/dl. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted separately on estimates of mean and dose responses on the ascending limb and on descending limb data. To examine the generalizability of this factor structure, these analyses were repeated in heavy drinkers (≥14 drinks/wk for men, ≥7 for women; n = 132) and light drinkers (i.e., nonheavy drinkers; n = 110).

resultsIn the full sample, a 4-factor solution was supported for ascending limb mean and dose responses and descending limb data representing the following SR domains: Stimulation/Hedonia, Craving/Motivation, Sedation/Motor Intoxication, and Negative Affect. This 4-factor solution was replicated in heavy drinkers. In light drinkers, however, SR was better summarized by a 3-factor solution where ascending mean and descending limb responses consisted of Stimulation/Hedonia, Craving/Motivation, and a general negative valence factor, and dose responses consisted of a general positive valence factor, Sedation/Motor Intoxication, and Negative Affect.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that SR represents a multifaceted construct with consistent factor structure across both ascending and descending limbs. Further, as drinking levels escalate, more defined Craving/Motivation and negative valence dimensions may emerge. Longitudinal studies examining these constructs are needed to further our understanding of SR as potentially sensitive to alcohol-induced neuroadaptation.

Indexed as

AdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcohol-Related DisordersFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCravingFactor AnalysisSedationStimulationSubjective Response

Identifiers

PMID26010049
PMCPMC4490987
OpenAlexW1742746881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.