Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2015
Motivational tools to improve probationer treatment outcomes.
Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01891656 (In-Person VS. Computer Interventions for Increasing Probation Compliance), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
In-Person VS. Computer Interventions for Increasing Probation Compliance
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of an mHealth Intervention to Improve Engagement in HIV Community-Based Care Among Persons Recently Released from a Correctional Facility in Washington, DC: A Pilot Study.AIDS and behavior · 2019Trial
- Effectiveness of a computerized motivational intervention on treatment initiation and substance use: Results from a randomized trial.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2017Trial
- People's reasons for wanting to complete probation: Use and predictive validity in an e-health intervention.Evaluation and program planning · 2017Trial
- A Pilot Study of a Brief Motivational Intervention for Incarcerated Drinkers.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2016Trial
- The relationship between electronic goal reminders and subsequent drug use and treatment initiation in a criminal justice setting.Addictive behaviors · 2015Trial
- Use of Digital Health and Digital Therapeutics to Treat SUD in Criminal Justice Settings: a Review.Current addiction reports · 2024Article
- The language of change among criminal justice clients: Counselor language, client language, and client substance use outcomes.Journal of clinical psychology · 2018Article
- Cost and cost-effectiveness of computerized vs. in-person motivational interventions in the criminal justice system.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2018Article
- Serious mental illness and negative substance use consequences among adults on probation.Health & justice · 2018Article
- Motivational Interviewing Fidelity in a Community Corrections Setting: Treatment Initiation and Subsequent Drug Use.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMotivational interviewing (MI) is a promising practice to increase motivation, treatment retention, and reducing recidivism among offender populations. Computer-delivered interventions have grown in popularity as a way to change behaviors associated with drug and alcohol use. METHODS/
designMotivational Assistance Program to Initiate Treatment (MAPIT) is a three arm, multisite, randomized controlled trial, which examines the impact of Motivational interviewing (MI), a motivational computer program (MC), and supervision as usual (SAU) on addiction treatment initiation, engagement, and retention. Secondary outcomes include drug/alcohol use, probation progress, recidivism (i.e., criminal behavior) and HIV/AIDS testing and treatment among probationers. Participant characteristics are measured at baseline, 2, and 6 months after assignment. The entire study will include 600 offenders, with each site recruiting 300 offenders (Baltimore City, Maryland and Dallas, Texas). All participants will go through standard intake procedures for probation and participate in probation requirements as usual. After standard intake, participants will be recruited and screened for eligibility. DISCUSSION: The results of this clinical trial will fill a gap in knowledge about ways to motivate probationers to participate in addiction treatment and HIV care. This randomized clinical trial is innovative in the way it examines the use of in-person vs. technological approaches to improve probationer success.
trial registrationNCT01891656.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.