ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2015
Neuroscience of aphasia recovery: the concept of neural multifunctionality.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measurement of cross-language and cross-domain generalization following semantic feature-based anomia treatment in bilingual aphasia.Neuropsychological rehabilitation · 2026Trial
- Executive Functions Training Improves Language Abilities in Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Does Executive Function Training Impact on Communication? A Randomized Controlled tDCS Study on Post-Stroke Aphasia.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Assessing executive functions in post-stroke aphasia-utility of verbally based tests.Brain communications · 2022Article
- A Review on Treatment-Related Brain Changes in Aphasia.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020Review
- Recursive hierarchical embedding in vision is impaired by posterior middle temporal gyrus lesions.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2019Article
- Links Between Short-Term Memory and Word Retrieval in Aphasia.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2018Article
- Unification of behavioural, computational and neural accounts of word production errors in post-stroke aphasia.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2018Article
- Short-Term Memory and Aphasia: From Theory to Treatment.Seminars in speech and language · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aphasia therapy, while demonstrably successful, has been limited by its primary focus on language, with relatively less attention paid to nonlinguistic factors (cognitive, affective, praxic) that play a major role in recovery from aphasia. Neuroscientific studies of the past 15-20 years have opened a breach in the wall of traditional clinico-anatomical teachings on aphasia. It is not an exaggeration to talk of a paradigm shift. The term "neural multifunctionality" denotes a complex web of neural networks supporting both linguistic and nonlinguistic functions in constant and dynamic interaction, creating language as we know it and contributing to recovery from aphasia following brain damage. This paper reviews scientific underpinnings of neural multifunctionality and suggests ways in which this new approach to understanding the neural basis of language can lead to meaningful, practical steps for improvements in aphasia therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26008816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.