Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26008783›Full record

ReviewInternational review of cell and molecular biology2015

Oxidative stress, unfolded protein response, and apoptosis in developmental toxicity.

Allison Kupsco, Daniel Schlenk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International review of cell and molecular biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Oxidative protein folding and CaCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Biomolecules · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cataract Induced by Glucocorticoids.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Allison KupscoEnvironmental Toxicology Program, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
Daniel SchlenkEnvironmental Toxicology Program, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA; Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.

Funding

Research Training in Environmental ToxicologyT32ES018827 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI Yinsheng Wang · 2010 to 2026
$5.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES018827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiological development requires precise spatiotemporal regulation of cellular and molecular processes. Disruption of these key events can generate developmental toxicity in the form of teratogenesis or mortality. The mechanism behind many developmental toxicants remains unknown. While recent work has focused on the unfolded protein response (UPR), oxidative stress, and apoptosis in the pathogenesis of disease, few studies have addressed their relationship in developmental toxicity. Redox regulation, UPR, and apoptosis are essential for physiological development and can be disturbed by a variety of endogenous and exogenous toxicants to generate lethality and diverse malformations. This review examines the current knowledge of the role of oxidative stress, UPR, and apoptosis in physiological development as well as in developmental toxicity, focusing on studies and advances in vertebrates model systems.

Indexed as

ApoptosisOxidative StressTeratogenesisUnfolded Protein ResponseAnimalsDevelopmental DisabilitiesHumansApoptosisDevelopmental toxicityER stressOxidative stressTeratogenesisUnfolded protein response

Identifiers

PMID26008783
PMCPMC4792257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.