Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26008742›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of cell biology2015

Brain barriers: Crosstalk between complex tight junctions and adherens junctions.

Silvia Tietz, Britta Engelhardt

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 301 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
301citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
21.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

301 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 523 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Amyloid-Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  19. The emerging role of T cells in depression.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

241 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silvia TietzTheodor Kocher Institute, University of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Britta EngelhardtTheodor Kocher Institute, University of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland bengel@tki.unibe.ch.
University of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unique intercellular junctional complexes between the central nervous system (CNS) microvascular endothelial cells and the choroid plexus epithelial cells form the endothelial blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the epithelial blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB), respectively. These barriers inhibit paracellular diffusion, thereby protecting the CNS from fluctuations in the blood. Studies of brain barrier integrity during development, normal physiology, and disease have focused on BBB and BCSFB tight junctions but not the corresponding endothelial and epithelial adherens junctions. The crosstalk between adherens junctions and tight junctions in maintaining barrier integrity is an understudied area that may represent a promising target for influencing brain barrier function.

Indexed as

Adherens JunctionsAnimalsBiological TransportBlood-Brain BarrierBrainEndothelial CellsEndothelium, VascularHumansMicrovesselsTight Junctions

Identifiers

PMID26008742
PMCPMC4442813
OpenAlexW1929386789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.