Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26007334›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2015

Vitamin D and Graves' disease: a meta-analysis update.

Mei-Yan Xu, Bing Cao, Jian Yin, Dong-Fang Wang, Kai-Li Chen, Qing-Bin Lu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Graves Disease and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Article
  17. How Does Vitamin D Affect Immune Cells Crosstalk in Autoimmune Diseases?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Vitamin D and the Thyroid: A Critical Review of the Current Evidence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mei-Yan XuDepartment of Nutrition, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing 100049, China. xumeiyan1985622@126.com.
Bing CaoSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China. caobing@bjmu.edu.cn.
Jian YinDepartment of Nutrition, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing 100049, China. 13011068860@163.com.
Dong-Fang WangSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China. wdf@bjmu.edu.cn.
Kai-Li ChenDepartment of Respiratory, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing 100049, China. chen_kaili@sina.cn.
Qing-Bin LuSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China. qingbinlu@bjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between vitamin D levels and Graves' disease is not well studied. This update review aims to further analyze the relationship in order to provide an actual view of estimating the risk. We searched for the publications on vitamin D and Graves' disease in English or Chinese on PubMed, EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medical and Wanfang databases. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for the vitamin D levels. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were calculated for vitamin D deficiency. We also performed sensitivity analysis and meta-regression. Combining effect sizes from 26 studies for Graves' disease as an outcome found a pooled effect of SMD = -0.77 (95% CI: -1.12, -0.42; p < 0.001) favoring the low vitamin D level by the random effect analysis. The meta-regression found assay method had the definite influence on heterogeneity (p = 0.048). The patients with Graves' disease were more likely to be deficient in vitamin D compared to the controls (OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.31, 3.81) with a high heterogeneity (I2 = 84.1%, p < 0.001). We further confirmed that low vitamin D status may increase the risk of Graves' disease.

Indexed as

Graves DiseaseHumansRisk FactorsVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyVitamin DGraves’ diseasemeta-analysismeta-regressionsensitivity analysisVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID26007334
PMCPMC4446781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.