Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26007200›Full record

ReviewNeuromolecular medicine2015

Structure, Distribution, and Function of Neuronal/Synaptic Spinules and Related Invaginating Projections.

Ronald S Petralia, Ya-Xian Wang, Mark P Mattson, Pamela J Yao

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuromolecular medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Seeing Is Perceiving (Believing).Neuromolecular medicine · 2022
    Review
  9. Recent progresses in novelFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Invaginating Structures in Synapses - Perspective.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Invaginating Structures in Mammalian Synapses.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ronald S PetraliaAdvanced Imaging Core, NIDCD/NIH, 35A Center Drive, Room 1E614, Bethesda, MD, 20892-3729, USA, petralia@nidcd.nih.gov.
Ya-Xian Wang
Mark P Mattson
Pamela J Yao
Advanced Imaging Research (United States) · USNational Institute on Aging · US

Funding

Advanced Imaging CoreZICDC000081 · NIDCD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS · PI WINKLER, DENNIS · 2012 to 2025
$17.4M
Synaptic Plasticity In Aging And Neurodegenerative DisordersZIAAG000317 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI MATTSON, MARK · 2009 to 2018
$8.5M
Neuroprotective And Neurorestorative Signaling Mechanisms in Alzheimer's DiseaseZIAAG000314 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI MATTSON, MARK · 2009 to 2018
$6.7M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIC DC000081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons and especially their synapses often project long thin processes that can invaginate neighboring neuronal or glial cells. These "invaginating projections" can occur in almost any combination of postsynaptic, presynaptic, and glial processes. Invaginating projections provide a precise mechanism for one neuron to communicate or exchange material exclusively at a highly localized site on another neuron, e.g., to regulate synaptic plasticity. The best-known types are postsynaptic projections called "spinules" that invaginate into presynaptic terminals. Spinules seem to be most prevalent at large very active synapses. Here, we present a comprehensive review of all kinds of invaginating projections associated with both neurons in general and more specifically with synapses; we describe them in all animals including simple, basal metazoans. These structures may have evolved into more elaborate structures in some higher animal groups exhibiting greater synaptic plasticity. In addition to classic spinules and filopodial invaginations, we describe a variety of lesser-known structures such as amphid microvilli, spinules in giant mossy terminals and en marron/brush synapses, the highly specialized fish retinal spinules, the trophospongium, capitate projections, and fly gnarls, as well as examples in which the entire presynaptic or postsynaptic process is invaginated. These various invaginating projections have evolved to modify the function of a particular synapse, or to channel an effect to one specific synapse or neuron, without affecting those nearby. We discuss how they function in membrane recycling, nourishment, and cell signaling and explore how they might change in aging and disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionCell Surface ExtensionsHumansInvertebratesNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsParacrine CommunicationPost-Synaptic DensityPresynaptic TerminalsPseudopodiaSpecies SpecificitySynapsesVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID26007200
PMCPMC4536166
OpenAlexW2175891223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.