Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26006264›Full record

Trial reportSchizophrenia bulletin2015

A Multisite, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Computerized Cognitive Remediation Therapy for Schizophrenia.

Jesús J Gomar, Elia Valls, Joaquim Radua, Celia Mareca, Josep Tristany, Francisco del Olmo, Carlos Rebolleda-Gil, María Jañez-Álvarez, Francisco J de Álvaro, María R Ovejero and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Jesús J GomarFIDMAG Hermanas Hospitalarias Research Foundation, Barcelona, Spain; CIBERSAM, Spain; Litwin-Zucker Research Center, the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York;
Elia VallsFIDMAG Hermanas Hospitalarias Research Foundation, Barcelona, Spain;
Joaquim RaduaFIDMAG Hermanas Hospitalarias Research Foundation, Barcelona, Spain; CIBERSAM, Spain; Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK;
Celia MarecaPsicoclínica Mare de Déu de la Mercè, Barcelona, Spain;
Josep TristanyHospital Sagrat Cor Martorell, Barcelona, Spain;
Francisco del OlmoClinica San Miguel, Madrid, Spain;
Carlos Rebolleda-GilCentros de Rehabilitacion Picosocial de Aranjuez y Vallecas, Madrid, Spain;
María Jañez-ÁlvarezClinica San Miguel, Madrid, Spain;
Francisco J de ÁlvaroComplejo Asistencial Benito Menni, Ciempozuelos, Madrid, Spain;
María R OvejeroHospital de San Luis, Palencia, Spain;
Ana LlorenteBenito Menni CASM, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina TeixidóPsicoclínica Mare de Déu de la Mercè, Barcelona, Spain;
Ana M DonaireHospital Sagrat Cor Martorell, Barcelona, Spain;
Eduardo García-LaredoClinica San Miguel, Madrid, Spain;
Andrea LazcanoiturburuCentros de Rehabilitacion Picosocial de Aranjuez y Vallecas, Madrid, Spain;
Luis GranellComplejo Asistencial Benito Menni, Ciempozuelos, Madrid, Spain;
Cristina de Pablo MozoHospital de San Luis, Palencia, Spain;
Mónica Pérez-HernándezBenito Menni CASM, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana Moreno-AlcázarFIDMAG Hermanas Hospitalarias Research Foundation, Barcelona, Spain; CIBERSAM, Spain;
Edith Pomarol-ClotetFIDMAG Hermanas Hospitalarias Research Foundation, Barcelona, Spain; CIBERSAM, Spain; edith.pomarol@gmail.com.
Peter J McKennaFIDMAG Hermanas Hospitalarias Research Foundation, Barcelona, Spain; CIBERSAM, Spain;
Cognitive Rehabilitation Study Group
Clínica Subiza · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental · ESFidmag Sisters Hospitallers · ESHospital Mare de Déu de la Mercè · ESHospital Universitari Sagrat Cor · ESFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) for the neuropsychological deficits seen in schizophrenia is supported by meta-analysis. However, a recent methodologically rigorous trial had negative findings. In this study, 130 chronic schizophrenic patients were randomly assigned to computerized CRT, an active computerized control condition (CC) or treatment as usual (TAU). Primary outcome measures were 2 ecologically valid batteries of executive function and memory, rated under blind conditions; other executive and memory tests and a measure of overall cognitive function were also employed. Carer ratings of executive and memory failures in daily life were obtained before and after treatment. Computerized CRT was found to produce improvement on the training tasks, but this did not transfer to gains on the primary outcome measures and most other neuropsychological tests in comparison to either CC or TAU conditions. Nor did the intervention result in benefits on carer ratings of daily life cognitive failures. According to this study, computerized CRT is not effective in schizophrenia. The use of both active and passive CCs suggests that nature of the control group is not an important factor influencing results.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCognition DisordersCognitive Behavioral TherapyExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMemory DisordersMiddle AgedSchizophreniaTherapy, Computer-AssistedTreatment FailureYoung Adultcognitioncognitive remediationneuropsychologyschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID26006264
PMCPMC4601710
OpenAlexW1939396887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.