Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26005970›Full record

ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Assessment of survival of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma after radical cytoreductive nephrectomy versus no surgery: a seer analysis.

Wen-Jun Xiao, Yao Zhu, Bo Dai, Hai-Liang Zhang, Ding-Wei Ye

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. 2024 CUA-KCRNC Expert Report: Management of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wen-Jun XiaoDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yao ZhuDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Bo DaiDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hai-Liang ZhangDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Ding-Wei YeDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposesTo examine the factors related to the choice of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mCCRCC), and compare the population-based survival rates of patients treated with or without surgery in the modern targeted therapy era. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom 2006 to 2009, patients with mCCRCC were identified from SEER database. The factors that affected patients to be submitted to CN were examined and propensity scores for each patient were calculated. Then patients were matched based upon propensity scores. Univariable and multivariable cox regression models were used to compare survival rates of patients treated with or without surgery. Finally, sensitivity analysis for the cox model on a hazard ratio scale was performed.

resultsAge, race, tumor size, T stage and N stage were associated with nephrectomy univariablely. After the match based upon propensity scores, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year cancer-specific survival rate estimates were 45.1%, 27.9%, and 21.7% for the no-surgery group vs 70.6%, 52.2%, and 41.7% for the surgery group, respectively (hazard ratio 0.42, 95%CI: 0.35-0.52, log-rank P<0.001). In multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model, race, T stage, N stage and median household income were significantly associated with survival. Sensitivity analysis on a hazard ratio scale indicated that the hazard ratio might be above 1.00 only when the unknown factor had an opposite effect on survival which was 3-fold than CN.

conclusionThe results of our study showed that CN significantly improves the survival of patients with metastatic CCRCC even in the targeted therapy era.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsCarcinoma, Renal CellCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNephrectomyPropensity ScoreProportional Hazards ModelsSEER ProgramSex FactorsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID26005970
PMCPMC4752092
OpenAlexW385860274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.