ArticleProceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting
A novel method for testing association of multiple genetic markers with a multinomial trait.
Article in Proceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We developed a multinomial probit model with singular value decomposition for testing a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) simultaneously, using maximum likelihood estimation and permutation. The method was validated by simulation. We simulated 1000 SNPs, including 9 associated with disease states, and 8 of the 9 were successfully identified. Applying the method to study 32 genes in our Mexican-American samples for association with prediabetes through either impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or impaired fasting glucose (IFG), we found 3 genes (SORCS1, AMPD1, PPAR) associated with both IGT and IFG, while 5 genes (AMPD2, PRKAA2, C5, TCF7L2, ITR) with the IGT mechanism only and 6 genes (CAPN10, IL4,NOS3, CD14, GCG, SORT1) with the IFG mechanism only. These data suggest that IGT and IFG may indicate different physiological mechanism to prediabetes, via different genetic determinants.
Identifiers
26005397PMC4439253W2421597135What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.