Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26005323›Full record

ArticleCancer informatics2015

Assessment of weighted quantile sum regression for modeling chemical mixtures and cancer risk.

Jenna Czarnota, Chris Gennings, David C Wheeler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prognostic impact of PMiScience · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The impact of mixed exposure to PMFrontiers in public health · 2026
    Article
  18. Distributed lag interaction model with index modification.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jenna CzarnotaDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Chris GenningsDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
David C WheelerDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

Funding

The Mount Sinai Transdisciplinary Center on Early Environmental ExposuresP30ES023515 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Robert O Wright · 2014 to 2026
$21.3M
Integration of Mixtures Toxicology, Toxicogenomics, and StatisticsT32ES007334 · NIEHS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI WHEELER, DAVID CHARLES · 2002 to 2018
$2.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES023515NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In evaluation of cancer risk related to environmental chemical exposures, the effect of many chemicals on disease is ultimately of interest. However, because of potentially strong correlations among chemicals that occur together, traditional regression methods suffer from collinearity effects, including regression coefficient sign reversal and variance inflation. In addition, penalized regression methods designed to remediate collinearity may have limitations in selecting the truly bad actors among many correlated components. The recently proposed method of weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression attempts to overcome these problems by estimating a body burden index, which identifies important chemicals in a mixture of correlated environmental chemicals. Our focus was on assessing through simulation studies the accuracy of WQS regression in detecting subsets of chemicals associated with health outcomes (binary and continuous) in site-specific analyses and in non-site-specific analyses. We also evaluated the performance of the penalized regression methods of lasso, adaptive lasso, and elastic net in correctly classifying chemicals as bad actors or unrelated to the outcome. We based the simulation study on data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program (NCI-SEER) case-control study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) to achieve realistic exposure situations. Our results showed that WQS regression had good sensitivity and specificity across a variety of conditions considered in this study. The shrinkage methods had a tendency to incorrectly identify a large number of components, especially in the case of strong association with the outcome.

Indexed as

cancer riskelastic netenvironmentlassopenalized regressionWQS regression

Identifiers

PMID26005323
PMCPMC4431483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.