Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26005235›Full record

ArticleNuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment2014

PET/MRI assessment of the infarcted mouse heart.

Guido Buonincontri, Carmen Methner, Thomas Krieg, Robert C Hawkes, T Adrian Carpenter, Stephen J Sawiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guido BuonincontriWolfson Brain Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Carmen MethnerDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Thomas KriegDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Robert C HawkesWolfson Brain Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
T Adrian CarpenterWolfson Brain Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Stephen J SawiakWolfson Brain Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom ; Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 086900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure originating from myocardial infarction (MI) is a leading cause of death worldwide. Mouse models of ischaemia and reperfusion injury (I/R) are used to study the effects of novel treatment strategies targeting MI, however staging disease and treatment efficacy is a challenge. Damage and recovery can be assessed on the cellular, tissue or whole-organ scale but these are rarely measured in concert. Here, for the first time, we present data showing measures of injury in infarcted mice using complementary techniques for multi-modal characterisation of the heart. We use

Indexed as

mousemultimodalitymyocardial infarctionPET/MRI

Identifiers

PMID26005235
PMCPMC4441008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.