Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26004761›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2015

A comparative analysis of spindle morphometrics across metazoans.

Marina E Crowder, Magdalena Strzelecka, Jeremy D Wilbur, Matthew C Good, George von Dassow, Rebecca Heald

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mechanisms underlying spindle assembly and robustness.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Tubulin post-translational modifications in meiosis.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  19. Regulation of organelle size and organization during development.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marina E CrowderDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Electronic address: marinaec@berkeley.edu.
Magdalena StrzeleckaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Jeremy D WilburDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Matthew C GoodDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
George von DassowOregon Institute of Marine Biology, Charleston, OR 97420 USA.
Rebecca HealdDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Electronic address: bheald@berkeley.edu.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

STUDYING SPINDLE ASSEMBLY AND FUNCTION USING DNA BEADSR01GM057839 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HEALD, REBECCA W · 1998 to 2014
$3.3M
Elucidating Differences between Meiotic and Mitotic SpindlesF32GM105199 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ELLEFSON CROWDER, MARINA LYN · 2013 to 2015
$118k
NIGMS NIH HHS 5F32 GM105199NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM105199NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell division in all eukaryotes depends on function of the spindle, a microtubule-based structure that segregates chromosomes to generate daughter cells in mitosis or haploid gametes in meiosis. Spindle size adapts to changes in cell size and shape, which vary dramatically across species and within a multicellular organism, but the nature of scaling events and their underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Cell size variations are most pronounced in early animal development, as egg diameters range from tens of microns up to millimeters across animal phyla, and decrease several orders of magnitude during rapid reductive divisions. During early embryogenesis in the model organisms X. laevis and C. elegans, the spindle scales with cell size [1, 2], a phenomenon regulated by molecules that modulate microtubule dynamics [3-6], as well as by limiting cytoplasmic volume [7, 8]. However, it is not known to what extent spindle scaling is conserved across organisms and among different cell types. Here we show that in a range of metazoan phyla, mitotic spindle length decreased with cell size across an ∼30-fold difference in zygote size. Maximum spindle length varied, but linear spindle scaling occurred similarly in all species once embryonic cell diameter reduced to 140 μm. In contrast, we find that the female meiotic spindle does not scale as closely to egg size, adopting a more uniform size across species that most likely reflects its specialized function. Our analysis reveals that spindle morphometrics change abruptly, within one cell cycle, at the transition from meiosis to mitosis in most animals.

Indexed as

ChordataInvertebratesSpindle ApparatusAnimalsEmbryo, MammalianEmbryo, NonmammalianFemaleMale

Identifiers

PMID26004761
PMCPMC4464779
OpenAlexW1507819507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.