Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26004498›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2016

Progress and problems with the use of suicide genes for targeted cancer therapy.

Zahra Karjoo, Xuguang Chen, Arash Hatefi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Liposomal delivery of gene therapy for ovarian cancer: a systematic review.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Engineered tumor-tropic mesenchymal stem cells as targeted therapeutic delivery systems for refractory Ovarian cancer.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zahra KarjooDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08855, United States.
Xuguang ChenDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08855, United States.
Arash HatefiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08855, United States; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, United States. Electronic address: ahatefi@pharmacy.rutgers.edu.

Funding

A Nanotechnology Platform for Suicide Gene Therapy of Recurring Ovarian CancerR01CA175318 · NCI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI HATEFI, ARASH · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
Bioengineering a Safe and Efficient Vector Technology for Stem Cell TransfectionR21EB016792 · NIBIB · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI HATEFI, ARASH · 2014 to 2015
$426k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175318NCI NIH HHS R01CA175318NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB016792NIBIB NIH HHS R21EB016792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among various gene therapy methods for cancer, suicide gene therapy attracts a special attention because it allows selective conversion of non-toxic compounds into cytotoxic drugs inside cancer cells. As a result, therapeutic index can be increased significantly by introducing high concentrations of cytotoxic molecules to the tumor environment while minimizing impact on normal tissues. Despite significant success at the preclinical level, no cancer suicide gene therapy protocol has delivered the desirable clinical significance yet. This review gives a critical look at the six main enzyme/prodrug systems that are used in suicide gene therapy of cancer and familiarizes readers with the state-of-the-art research and practices in this field. For each enzyme/prodrug system, the mechanisms of action, protein engineering strategies to enhance enzyme stability/affinity and chemical modification techniques to increase prodrug kinetics and potency are discussed. In each category, major clinical trials that have been performed in the past decade with each enzyme/prodrug system are discussed to highlight the progress to date. Finally, shortcomings are underlined and areas that need improvement in order to produce clinical significance are delineated.

Indexed as

Genes, Transgenic, SuicideGenetic TherapyAnimalsEnzymesHumansNeoplasmsProdrugsEnzymesProdrugsBystander effectCancer Gene therapyCytosine deaminaseEnzyme prodrugGanciclovirGDEPTNitroreductaseThymidine kinase

Identifiers

PMID26004498
PMCPMC4758904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.