Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26003869›Full record

ArticlePM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2015

Disability Stage is an Independent Risk Factor for Mortality in Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 65 Years and Older.

Sean Hennessy, Jibby E Kurichi, Qiang Pan, Joel E Streim, Hillary R Bogner, Dawei Xie, Margaret G Stineman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sean HennessyClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 803 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Dr, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021.
Jibby E KurichiClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Qiang PanClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Joel E StreimGeriatric Psychiatry Section of the Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Hillary R BognerDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Dawei XieClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Margaret G StinemanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

Clinical Importance of Drug-Drug InteractionsR01AG025152 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HENNESSY, SEAN, LI, LANG · 2006 to 2021
$8.1M
Drug-Drug Interactions Involving Antidiabetic AgentsR01DK102694 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HENNESSY, SEAN, LI, LANG · 2014 to 2017
$2.4M
Ambulatory Care Access and QualityR01HD074756 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HENNESSY, SEAN · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
Staging Activity LimitationR01AG040105 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HENNESSY, SEAN · 2012 to 2016
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG025152NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040105NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD074756NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK102694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStages of activity limitation based on activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) have been found to predict mortality in persons aged 70 years and older but have not been examined in Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older using data that are routinely collected.

objectiveTo examine the association between functional stages based on items of ADLs and IADLs with 3-year mortality in Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older, accounting for baseline sociodemographics, health status, smoking, subjective health, and psychological well-being.

designA cohort study using the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) and associated health care utilization data.

settingCommunity administered survey.

participantsThe study included 9698 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older who participated in the MCBS in 2005-2007.

main outcome measuresDeath within 3 years of cohort entry.

resultsThe overall mortality rate was 3.6 per 100 person years, and 3-year cumulative mortality was 10.3%. Unadjusted 3-year mortality was monotonically associated with both ADL stage and IADL stage. Adjusted 3-year mortality was associated with ADL and IADL stages, except that in some models the hazard ratio for stage III (which includes persons with atypical activity limitation patterns) was numerically lower than that for stage II.

conclusionWe found nearly monotonic relationships between ADL and IADL stage and adjusted 3-year mortality. These findings could aid in the development of population health approaches and metrics for evaluating the success of alternative economic, social, or health policies on the longevity of older adults with activity limitations.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingHealth StatusAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMedicareMobility LimitationPersons with DisabilitiesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival RateTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26003869
PMCPMC4654991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.