Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26003329›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2015

Optimizing Quality and Efficiency of Healthcare Delivery in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Navneet S Majhail

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. National Institutes of Health Blood and Marrow Transplant Late Effects Initiative: The Healthcare Delivery Working Group Report.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2017
    Review
  6. Long-Term Survivorship after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Roadmap for Research and Care.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Navneet S MajhailBlood & Marrow Transplant Program, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA, majhain@ccf.org.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hematopoietic cell transplantation is a complex and resource intense procedure that can be associated with high risks of treatment failure due to disease relapse or complications. There also exists considerable variability among transplant centers with respect to the number of procedures performed, available resources and personnel, patient selection, transplant practices, and supportive care. Hematopoietic cell transplantation as a specialty has been a pioneer in incorporating the constructs of quality and efficiency routinely in patient care. However, several challenges still remain. Harmonization of data collection and reporting, use of innovative technological tools, evidence-based practice supported by clinical trials, better efforts towards care coordination and transition of care, and reduction of variation will facilitate these efforts and will lead to improved experience and outcomes for hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationQuality of Health CareDelivery of Health CareHumansOutcome Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID26003329
OpenAlexW315268812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.